Community Tasting Notes 12

• Periko wrote: 89 points

  December 12, 2023 - In a much better spot than any previous bottle. No sight of a second fermentation right out of the bottle and kept like this for the 3-4 days it was consumed. Almost integrated tannins, savory, mid-weight and even fresh. A completely different bottle, hopefully the rest follow this path.

  Comment

• Mtpisgah Likes this wine:

  March 27, 2022 - PnP on Friday. Good. A bit big. No secondary fermentation.
  Sunday night it had mellowed a bit and was very enjoyable.

  Comment

• prasm wrote: flawed

  April 14, 2021 - My first of 6 bottles left in ship box in my cellar since delivery. Obvious signs of seepage and protruding cork. Cork was soaked so a Durand was used to open. Wine seeped from the cork in the hole made by the corkscrew upon entry. When the Ah-So portion of the Durand was entered a noticeable rush of air exited the bottle. The wine itself is drinkable, but extremely muted - almost tasteless. This appears to be a common problem with this bottling unfortunately.

  Comments (1)

• Periko wrote: flawed

  December 20, 2020 - Undrinkable. The worst bottle so far, straight down the sink.

  Comment

• grayfont wrote: flawed

  December 12, 2020 - Soaked cork, fully oxidized. Completely undrinkable.

  2 people found this helpful Comments (3)

Pro Reviews 0

• No pro reviews found.

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2013
• Type Red
• Producer CT Barrel Project
• Varietal Cabernet Sauvignon
• Designation Spring Mtn/Rutherford Blend
• Vineyard n/a
• Country USA
• Region California
• SubRegion Napa Valley
• Appellation Napa Valley

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 12 (2%)
• In Cellars 121 (19%)
• Consumed 509 (79%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine