Community Tasting Notes 8

• windypinot wrote: 88 points

  January 24, 2010 - Very nice value zinfandel; not overly compelx, but still good body; great red for a weekday

  Comment

• kmicho wrote: 84 points

  November 5, 2009 - Seem to be in the minority here. Didn't think this wine was anything special on day 1. For about $15/bottle, I think there are several better wines that just I know about. Better on day 2 than day 1. Day 1 seemed very tight, tannic even after an hour. Fairly undeveloped and a bit thin. Day 2 was more like many of the tasting notes others have posted. Day 2 notes: Nose: Smoke, some earthy tones. Taste: a little peaty, dark, heavy berries, not terribly complex.

  Comment

• bradgem wrote: 88 points

  August 27, 2009 - A bit too raisin-y for me, and I would like a little more earth. But otherwise a really nice, well balanced wine. Silky texture.

  Comment

• scarce10 wrote: 90 points

  July 30, 2009 - Very easy drinking. Not as opaque and heavy as most Rosemblum zins. VERY happy with this and a great value.

  Comment

• Leerum wrote: 91 points

  March 26, 2009 - Emu,
  It was the first bottle of red that i've had that didn't need to breath once opened. Silky smooth taste. Nice lingering after taste, left me wanting more. Pleasant dark fruit aromas. Worth the purchase. Would buy it again if there were any kicking around.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 0

• No pro reviews found.

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2006
• Type Red
• Producer Rosenblum Cellars
• Varietal Zinfandel
• Designation n/a
• Vineyard n/a
• Country USA
• Region California
• SubRegion San Francisco Bay
• Appellation Contra Costa County
• UPC Code 732048003384

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 35 (26%)
• Consumed 101 (74%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine