Community Tasting Notes 4

• RandyC wrote: 85 points

  July 10, 2010 - Licorice, jagermeister, and fake fruit punch nose. Blackberries and blueberries bathed in a simple syrup. Real sweet and no backbone, the all fruit forward palate finishes with 10 seconds of a berry salad and fades to nothing. More than I was expecting.

  Comment

• anubis wrote: 83 points

  April 25, 2010 - Sweetness has come out since last tasting. Little bit of tannin. Good drinking now and great value.

  Comment

• Tarrant wrote: 79 points

  November 7, 2009 - It tasted okay, but it was the epitome of boredom, a Merlot that would give Merlot a bad name, and it was also lacking in body and depth, so many good wines for this price point this should be a pass for sure - Dark red, medium bodied with a nose of light plum, cherry and vanilla, thin, minimal intensity and depth, sweet/smooth on the palate without length at all, skip this for sure (79 Points).

  Comment

• LelouchViBritannia wrote: 84 points

  October 19, 2008 - Specially ... bad. Absolutely nothing on the nose. very little fruit/sweetness. Toasty oak and surprisingly long finish but doesn't redeem itself from the bad impression at start.
  Any Australian Merlot is not recommended.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 2

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2006
• Type Red
• Producer Wolf Blass
• Varietal Merlot
• Designation Yellow Label
• Vineyard n/a
• Country Australia
• Region South Australia
• SubRegion n/a
• Appellation n/a
• UPC Code 000981376686

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 23 (41%)
• Consumed 33 (59%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine