Community Tasting Notes 6

• Neil H wrote: 75 points

  June 21, 2011 - Agree with the last couple reviewers. Not good, so bad its hard to describe.

  Comment

• WineScoundrel wrote: 85 points

  April 3, 2010 - I didn't find the finish as offensive as the last reviewer...but close.

  Comment

• Varus wrote: 74 points

  April 21, 2009 - This wine is NOT good. I have to wonder wether the others that have scored this wine here have actually enjoyed truly good Cab. This is, again, NOT good cab. There are good things about it, don't get me wrong. The nose is interesting enough - black licorice and pine needles. The mouth feel is rich, and, combined with the tannins one might be tricked into thinking that this wine was passable. But, sadly, the finish is so god awful, so terribly fake, that this wine falls flat on its face. This is just faked up, over sugared, god awful juice. The wine finishes like drinking a packet of Equal - that is how fake this wine is. As a group we laughed this wine out of the room and collectively dumped our glasses. At thirty dollars a bottle it is absolute thievery. There is plenty of good Cab out there at this price point - this just isn't one of those Cabs. Cheers.

  Comment

• jonb72 wrote: 89 points

  March 14, 2009 - very big and good, almost over the top

  Comment

• B Paul wrote: 90 points

  March 9, 2009 - 90+ pts.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 0

• No pro reviews found.

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2006
• Type Red
• Producer Miller Family Wine Company
• Varietal Cabernet Sauvignon
• Designation Volunteer
• Vineyard n/a
• Country USA
• Region California
• SubRegion Napa Valley
• Appellation Napa Valley

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 29 (35%)
• Consumed 55 (65%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine