wrote:

70 Points

Thursday, July 13, 2023 - Based on the other tasting notes this has to be a flawed bottle. The initial taste isn't awful but the aftertaste is horrid. I'd call it medicinal at best and it won't dissipate. 5 minutes later and it's still at the back of my mouth, even water won't get rid of it. Poured down the drain. Ugh, even 70 points is a stretch.

Post a Comment / View ken@ampy.com's profile
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue (445 views)

5 comments have been posted

  • Comment posted by Big Juicy Red:

    8/6/2023 10:14:00 AM - Of the bottle was flawed, it’s probably not fair to give it a score.

  • Comment posted by ken@ampy.com:

    8/6/2023 12:16:00 PM - Not sure it was flawed, Tight cork, no Ulage, I'm not sure it was supposed to taste the way it did but also not sure it wasn't. Might be just me and my taster, can't handle Brazil nuts either, taste like gasoline.

  • Comment posted by Big Juicy Red:

    8/6/2023 6:50:00 PM - I get that. I would merely suggest that if a wine that most people think is at least decent is really that bad, there’s a good chance that bottle was flawed in some way.

  • Comment posted by Brian Glas:

    8/8/2023 7:13:00 PM - Just post what you think even it was probably flawed. At the end of the day it is the winemakers duty to provide a good product. If they don't, I see no reason not to call them out even on flawed bottles.

  • Comment posted by pinoteer:

    9/8/2023 5:31:00 AM - If your bottle is flawed, then label it as such (there is a checkbox labeled, "bottle was flawed or defective"). In this case, then, you can't enter a score. Scoring a bottle that is actually flawed (outside the norm for a wine) leads to unreliable numerical ratings, and defeats the value of CT scoring.

Post a Comment / View ken@ampy.com's profile
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue (445 views)
×
×