Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - Good fruit, acidity, balance. Very nice stuff, as usual, but (surprisingly, especially for a '10) not as typical, attractive, or intense as the '09, '08, '07, '05, '04, or '03.
I'm aware of the (potential) problems with the vintage, but the med/low intensity of flavor/fruit is a little bit of a head-scratcher.
Just not up to usual standards for this bottling that has long been a favorite.
(89+)