2000 Château Pontet-Canet

Community Tasting Note

wrote:

flawed

Tuesday, July 7, 2015 - One of the strangest wines I've tasted in recent memory. Decanted about 8 hours. Thin, dessicated, very little fruit. Improved somewhat over the next couple of days. I'd probably give this an 80, but I'm going to assume this bottle was bad, perhaps stored in a hot warehouse for years. It wasn't corked and didn't really taste oxidized. Not a pleasurable tasting experience.

Post a Comment / View webbaker's profile
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue (9,750 views)

6 comments have been posted

  • Comment posted by sleepyhaus:

    7/8/2015 7:41:00 AM - You say that it wasn't corked, but it certainly sounds like a case of mild TCA. Not sure your sensitivity level there, but mild TCA tends to make wines taste thin and harsh even at levels not suggestive of wet cardboard etc.

  • Comment posted by webbaker:

    7/8/2015 7:54:00 AM - yep, that's certainly possible. My experience with TCA has always been so overwhelming that it was obvious.

  • Comment posted by sleepyhaus:

    7/8/2015 7:58:00 AM - I think that a lot of time mild TCA gets written off as something else, but it can still ruin the wine, leaving the fruit stripped and the midpalate very hollow.

  • Comment posted by webbaker:

    7/8/2015 8:00:00 AM - Thanks for the tip.

  • Comment posted by Remony:

    7/9/2015 5:26:00 AM - Far too many 2000s were ruined by the torrid conditions in the summer of 2003 when they were shipped from Bordeaux. I have cases of wines like GPL 2000 which have clearly suffered bad heat damage -- corks raised, seepage etc. Perhaps your Pontet-Canet is showing signs of such damage?

  • Comment posted by webbaker:

    7/9/2015 5:53:00 AM - No sign of that in the 1 (of 3) bottle that I opened. Cork was very sound with very little penetration, no seepage at all. Thanks for the info.

Post a Comment / View webbaker's profile
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue (9,750 views)
×
×