Sean McGrath
Posts: 371
Joined: 11/3/2020 From: US in NL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: KPB quote:
ORIGINAL: Sean McGrath … I read an interesting theory recently about why our brains are smaller than those of Neanderthals. Obviously brains consume an enormous amount of our energy budget, so they are costly. The idea is that by cooperation and specialization among a group, we were able to accomplish more with smaller brains. Distributed processing, so to speak. :-) My research is in distributed systems, so I like this, but honestly I doubt it. Newton and Einstein didn’t really make a lot of use of others. Perhaps you are a bit too bought into the self-made person narrative. There was a podcast about how nobody in existence today knows how to make a standard pencil from scratch: operate all the equipment to mine the carbon, fell the trees, mill the wood, assemble the pencil, run the stencil machine. Not to mention building the equipment to do all of those tasks. Newton and Einstein used roads, ate meat that they didn't butcher and hopefully drank wine. Not to mention they were actually educated, using books, and learning concepts from people who went before them. One way to think about your statement is to ask whether a stone-age Newton could have invented calculus. By your viewpoint, it should have been no issue. The most striking feature of humans compared to any other vertebrates is our extraordinary level of cooperation.
_____________________________
|