Community Tasting Note

• wineracquet wrote:

  July 1, 2015 - Not nearly as bad as the 78 rating and perhaps a little better than the 85 rating so far. It is nowhere near as good as the 2005 vintage which was a steal at $10 on WTSO a few years ago. I've had 3 bottles of the 2012. Yes, one was way too fruit forward, but not quite cough syrup; The other two were slightly too fruit forward but certainly drinkable and about what you'd expect at the $13 price point. It's not any worse than the Columbia Crest 2012 Grand Estates that WS somehow rated a 90, probably a bit better.

  1 person found this helpful 1,651 views

Add a Comment