Community Tasting Notes 6

• nfurlong wrote: 84 points

  July 13, 2020 - Not nearly as good as the Vita Luca it replaced.

  Comment

• tomoem wrote: 82 points

  July 21, 2017 - Barely drinkable cabernet (wait did i say cabernet ?). I cannot tell you what this is if it wasn't for the label. Avoid

  Comment

• Loudounwine wrote: 85 points

  August 30, 2016 - This wine is fine for what it is and what it costs. Perfectly drinkable -- not complex but tasty enough for a weeknight grilled cheese sandwich. We've paid more for wines we like less.

  Comment

• wineracquet wrote:

  July 1, 2015 - Not nearly as bad as the 78 rating and perhaps a little better than the 85 rating so far. It is nowhere near as good as the 2005 vintage which was a steal at $10 on WTSO a few years ago. I've had 3 bottles of the 2012. Yes, one was way too fruit forward, but not quite cough syrup; The other two were slightly too fruit forward but certainly drinkable and about what you'd expect at the $13 price point. It's not any worse than the Columbia Crest 2012 Grand Estates that WS somehow rated a 90, probably a bit better.

  1 person found this helpful Comment

• Barry'sFault wrote: 78 points

  June 11, 2015 - Hard to like this one. Immediate reaction is cough syrup. 'nuff said.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 0

• No pro reviews found.

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2012
• Type Red
• Producer VitaLuce
• Varietal Cabernet Sauvignon
• Designation Zelos
• Vineyard n/a
• Country USA
• Region California
• SubRegion North Coast
• Appellation Mendocino County

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 21 (36%)
• Consumed 38 (64%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine