Community Tasting Note

• RyanJames Likes this wine: 93 points

  April 9, 2017 - 2013 wasn't the best vintage for the reds, and I feared that it would drink like a 2011, but tasted blind you would never know and I think it's pretty clear that '13 is superior to '11 in every respect. Certainly not a 2010 or 2005, but this bottle has loads of flavor, concentration, depth, and complexity at 4 years old. This was clearly of grand cru quality and will age beautifully on its balance alone. I think the 2013s trade cheap and it's worth seeking out excellent producers for '13/'14 before the '15s send everything to the moon price-wise.

  1 person found this helpful 2,759 views

1 Comment

• Robert Pavlovich commented:

  11/9/18, 10:50 AM - 2013 is very underestimated. Cool, classic years are in very short supply these days.

Add a Comment