Important Update From the Founder Read message >

Comments on my notes

(10 comments on 8 notes)

1 - 8 of 8 Sort order
Red
2020 Château Lilian Ladouys St. Estèphe Red Bordeaux Blend
12/2/2023 - HenrikJ wrote:
92 points
Decanted 5 hours. Almost purple and inky in the glass. Feels closed and slightly muted on the nose, but showing some dark fruits, slight green notes, a whiff of cedar, hints of minerality and some alcohol. Medium bodied palate, hugely structured with massive tannins and lots of acidity, well extracted but the fruit is hidden. The finish is still quite impressive. This should be put away for around 10 years or so.
  • HenrikJ commented:

    12/12/23, 6:36 AM - Bottle variation is always an unknown variable. I'm speculating, but it might have been lucky you opened that particular bottle early as it might have developed an oxidation issue down the line, if my bottle was at all representative (which I must say seems likely for a young St. Estephe from an ambitious estate). I'll hold off on opening any more of mine at least 🙂

Red
2019 Château Pontet-Canet Pauillac Red Bordeaux Blend
8/19/2023 - Machine1 wrote:
89 points
No clue what the pros were tasting, but it certainly wasn't what was in my bottle, purchased from provincial monopoly on release. Opened and consumed by me over 5 hours. Very light bodied, with unripe watery light purple fruit (perhaps a little wild or savoury). Think $15 generic french wine in a poor year (and bordeaux, and pauillac in particular, is my go-to). Not flawed, just not good. Not juicy, not complex, not aromatic, not interesting, not long, not full bodied, not deep coloured, not bursting out of the glass, and it seems like the notes below suggest that I wasn't the only one to find this sorely lacking. I wonder how many of the high scores here are from those who were starry-eyed for the high scores and tasted non-blind; I'll probably give it another go in a few years and if it is anything like the first bottle (consumed several months ago) then the rest is on the chopping block. Meh at its finest.
  • HenrikJ commented:

    9/8/23, 10:18 AM - How very interesting! I also didn't particularly care for this wine, but my experience seems to have been the complete opposite of yours (i.e. over-ripe, over-extracted, lacking finesse).

Red
2008 Château Figeac St. Émilion Grand Cru Red Bordeaux Blend
10/15/2014 - HenrikJ wrote:
94 points
Trying this wine again you have to ask if this is at all the same wine as the guy below reviewed. It only highlights the importance of trying more than one bottle if a particular wine performes way differently than expected. Bad bottles may behave in other ways than the typical TCA-notes. The tannic structure on this wine is in fact massive and I get the feeling that this will probably outlive me even though I've barely hit 30 myself. The nose is filled with inky cassis, led pencil shavings, subtle but forward minerality and leather. The palate is medium bodied with, again, huge structure. The emphasis is on cool, dark fruitiness and minerals. The finish is good. This wine will be magical in a few years time. My previous score (for potential) stands. Expect more body, intensity, harmony and complexity as this wine starts to hit its drinking window in 5-10 years. It'll probably still be good in 50 years time.
  • HenrikJ commented:

    10/16/14, 2:16 AM - It's a well known fact that Parker doesn't generally like Figeac. He underrates most vintages compared to neighbouring estates and compared to how other pro reviewers rate Figeac. There are rumours of a mutual disrespect between the advocate and the owners of the chateau. Since Parker doesn't do blind tastings, who knows? Check out some of the other leading publications.

    The important question is, did you only try one bottle or have you verified your notes by trying more than one? As I said before, individual bottles can be bad without having obvious TCA. Flat wine with no tannins and no finish? For a wine like this my first and immediate guess would be that the bottle is bad and I'd give a NR until I try another one. One should always try to do that when one tries a wine which performs very differently than expected. Lets just hope it isn't due to poor storage, exposure to strong light, etc. before the bottles landed in your cellar so that more than one of them are affected.

  • HenrikJ commented:

    10/16/14, 2:33 AM - Fair enough. That's one of the beauties of wine reviewing. We don't all have to think the same. Hope your next bottle performs more like my bottles have for me.

Red
2008 G.D. Vajra Barolo Albe Nebbiolo
12/25/2013 - canefan Does not like this wine:
75 points
A horrible wine. I do not know who they paid off to get such a high wine spectator rating. I bought half a case and the wine consistantly tastes like a rubber balloon.
  • HenrikJ commented:

    2/25/14, 6:24 AM - You eighter got a bad case (poor storage perhaps) or you're not much of a Nebbiolo drinker. This is a pretty typical tasting, and quite high quality Barolo IMO.

Red
2008 Château Pontet-Canet Pauillac Red Bordeaux Blend
OK. This was the last bottle of spoof that I ever bought. I was caught up by the score and hadn't yet realized where my palate was heading. With that said, this is archetypical modern homogenized red Bordeaux type wine that can be had on five continents, and gets really high scores from numerous myriad "professional" wine critics. My wife asked for a red wine tonight, something like a 2008 Jordan would have been perfect. Well I was boxing these for the barter holler and took a chance and thought Julie would like it. Her description:

-a little red wine
-a little cigar ash tray
-a little saltwater
-a little flour/roux to hold it together

I told her she has made the perfect description for my mind's eye Modern spoofy wine.
  • HenrikJ commented:

    1/27/14, 2:51 PM - Pontet-Canet is usually not considered especially modern. I am pretty sure you had a bad bottle on a bad day, maybe even a counterfeit. And even if it was a good bottle, you drank it waaaay too young. I've tried this wine, along with other vintages, on a few occations and it's a waste to drink now. Sometimes, a young wine which is closed down will not appear young as in agressive but just completely lifeless. It's unfortunate that you're so quick to dismiss a wine based on the performance at one particular time, from a bottle which you probably can't know for sure if it was even real. Pontet-Canet makes fantastic wines, even for more traditional palates like my own. I wouldn't call it Parkerized at all.

    Cheers

  • HenrikJ commented:

    1/27/14, 2:51 PM - Pontet-Canet is usually not considered especially modern. I am pretty sure you had a bad bottle on a bad day, maybe even a counterfeit. And even if it was a good bottle, you drank it waaaay too young. I've tried this wine, along with other vintages, on a few occations and it's a waste to drink now. Sometimes, a young wine which is closed down will not appear young as in agressive but just completely lifeless. It's unfortunate that you're so quick to dismiss a wine based on the performance at one particular time, from a bottle which you probably can't know for sure if it was even real. Pontet-Canet makes fantastic wines, even for more traditional palates like my own. I wouldn't call it Parkerized at all.

    Cheers

Red
2005 Château Coufran Haut-Médoc Red Bordeaux Blend
10/15/2012 - cork breath wrote:
80 points
disappointing. Kind of flavorless. so what do I do with the rest of the case?
  • HenrikJ commented:

    8/29/13, 5:33 PM - You cellar it for 5 years minimum.

    Cheers

Red
2008 Shafer Relentless Napa Valley Syrah Blend, Syrah
6/2/2013 - tjkeegan wrote:
92 points
Strong wine, big kick. Tannins overwhelmed taste buds. Probably best served with spicy food or Monterray Jack cheese. Time will calm this puppy down.
  • HenrikJ commented:

    6/11/13, 2:42 AM - Do you think spicy food would go well with such a tannic red wine?

Red
2004 Château Ferrière Margaux Red Bordeaux Blend
9/4/2012 - HenrikJ wrote:
85 points
Too extracted and modern for a Margaux in my taste. Turns to plum jam, cooked berries and fruit compote pretty quickly. Flavour on the other hand is a bit thin. It's certainly drinkable if you're not beeing overly critical but it lacks all of the elegance I expect in a classified Margaux.
  • HenrikJ commented:

    5/7/13, 6:46 AM - Unsure about the drinking window. I can't recall how the structure was on this one. There's a chance that the overdone fruitiness settles down I guess, but without a solid tannic and acidic structure it won't be good. So I really don't know.

1 - 8 of 8
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close