Important Update From the Founder Read message >

Comments on my notes

(3 comments on 2 notes)

1 - 2 of 2 Sort order
Red
2012 Chateau Montelena Cabernet Sauvignon The Montelena Estate Calistoga
8/15/2015 - bestdamncab Likes this wine:
92 points
Family Winemakers 25th Anniversary Tasting, I remember their first at the Hyatt Embarcadero. Nose of ripe black cherry fruit, currants, and dusty earth, more of the same on the palate, almost elegant tasting, big body, mouth filling fruit, reminds me of the 1978 as it should improve the next five years and drink for twenty years, I almost always drink the vintages about 6 to 9 years as they seem livelier. medium/long finish
  • zuluvino commented:

    2/8/16, 12:31 PM - I had a very similar impression after having a bottle at a restaurant here in Columbus. I stay away from repeating the same old reviews but the word elegant is what resonates from your description. Some very subtle complexities in the profile that I didn't bother to study because I was having too much fun with a group of friends. I REALLY enjoyed this bottle. My kind of well crafted and silky style. 93 points

Red
2012 Caymus Cabernet Sauvignon 40th Anniversary Napa Valley
7/4/2015 - zuluvino Likes this wine:
95 points
Here's another example of wines that are under-rated by members at large on this site and why I always add 2 or 3 points to the average rating. This is a great wine that is way too young right now. It is surprising soft and silky but the flavors are separated and racy. Color is a bright violet and the nose explodes out of the glass which should tell people a lot. I sacrificed one bottle out of a case to get a baseline of it's development as it ages. Nowhere near drinkable. It should get roughly 4 years time if you want to start drinking but I can understand if you can't wait. I drank this the same evening as an '06 Mollly Dooker Enchanted Path which was stunning (an easy 96) and showed why many wine lovers need to assess bottles at maturity instead of throwing out a score as it's tasting now that is not a true assessment of its potential.
  • zuluvino commented:

    7/13/15, 11:43 AM - I hope I am right, too, Night Train. I've got the case minus the 1 bottle but am completely confident this will be near Special Selection quality (very similar profile) when all is said and done. A good friend of mine is also a member here and gets bothered by some of the reviews that are made that lack a perspective that only experience can bring. I hope this doesn't sound horribly condescending but it just seems an injustice to see scores of 88 or 89 points for wines that merit much more. It could be a style of wine issue but I would hope that people are able to enjoy this kind of quality and know it.

    By the way, I'm in Columbus too. Worthington actually.

  • zuluvino commented:

    7/13/15, 3:45 PM - Miller, I appreciate your response and think we can just have a friendly "agree to disagree" as I wouldn't say this wine is flabby at all.

    I do have a question, how would you like to have professional judges review wines? They certainly judge a wine on what they think it's merit will be at peak. What value would their opinions be if they judged a wine on how it tasted right then and there in barrel, just released, or just young. It's that level of experience and insight that makes their opinions valuable. My wife's opinion of that Molly Dooker would be just "not good" but her favorite wine is Kim Crawford Sav. Blanc. and has never warmed up to Cabernets or any wines with structure and pedigree. I love her to death and could care less about what her taste in wine is (as long as she's drinking wine that's all I care about!) but her opinions on the wines I drink would not be useful at all.

1 - 2 of 2
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close