Community Tasting Notes 9

• John Nezlek wrote: 88 points

  October 27, 2019 - Note: I use a scale on which 85 represents a very good wine.
  
  As suggested by the rating, a bit better than the bottle I had nine years ago, but still as noted by others, a bit disappointing given the price (not cheap) and the pedigree (Grand Cru). Opened up a bit through the bottle. Good balance but lacking the depth I thought it would/should have.
  
  Drink up -- no panic, bu value in holding.

  Comment

• RKatzDO wrote: flawed

  April 28, 2019 - Corked... Shame..

  Comment

• brucegolfer wrote: 90 points

  December 31, 2015 - This pricy corton-charlemagne never quite lives up to our expectations. Still, it is a complex wine with many enjoyable characteristics, but it is not the zinger one would expect from a grand cru.

  Comment

• brucegolfer wrote: 88 points

  October 7, 2012 - Disappointing. Flat, lacking in expression.

  Comment

• John Nezlek wrote: 86 points

  August 7, 2010 - I had a bottle of this at a friend's house, and I was simply not impressed. I found the wine to be a bit thin -- not very rich, certainly not a Grand Cru CC. It may be that it has sort of shut down -- I certainly hope so, as I have two of these myself. The professional reviews for this bottle were quite positive (WA-93, BH-90/93, Tanzer-89+), and although one reviewer might be off, it is rare when three are. So, I was and remain a bit puzzled. Perhaps more time is needed.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 3

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2004
• Type White
• Producer Verget
• Varietal Chardonnay
• Designation n/a
• Vineyard n/a
• Country France
• Region Burgundy
• SubRegion Côte de Beaune
• Appellation Corton-Charlemagne Grand Cru

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 15 (24%)
• Consumed 47 (76%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine