Community Tasting Note

Sunday, April 20, 2014 - The four vintages of Col Solare I've tasted have displayed noticeable nuance, no two are the same. The 2005, 2007, and 2009 vintages, however, can generally be categorized as bold; the 2008 is subdued, even elegant, by comparison. The nose is mostly mute, the attack soft. The wine comes to life at the mid palate, showing refined grainy tannins, and very nice acidity. This is accompanied by charming dark berry fruit that emerges from behind the oak. In a word, racy.

Post a Comment /
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue (3,076 views)

5 comments have been posted

Comment posted by VinLancaster:

5/5/2014 10:44:00 AM - Nice descriptor. Sounds like it won't hurt to continue to lay my bottles down.
Comment posted by Motz:

5/5/2014 10:48:00 AM - Agreed. I think they should age gracefully for five to seven years from today...but I would not hold them much longer than that.
Comment posted by NavyVet6874:

8/13/2014 12:11:00 PM - Great to see your notes on this vintage. Just finished my last '07, and have an opportunity to buy this vintage at $29/bottle. Should I get a case? I give you opinions great weight!
Comment posted by Motz:

8/13/2014 1:17:00 PM - Thank you for the kind words San Diego Dago. If you haven't tasted it, but you have liked previous vintages, at $29 it's a steal. The 2008 is a little softer and smoother IMO, so that's the variable. If I was buying Washington wines, and I am not right now, I would be tempted to pick up at least half a case at $29. Hope that helps.
Comment posted by NavyVet6874:

8/13/2014 3:35:00 PM - Thanks for the advice. By the way, I'll be at Spring Valley in WW for their club event on the 23rd.