Tasted blind. Powerful nose of peppery cologne, ryebread, and lemon curd. Fine bubbles. Toast palate, and very focused. This is turned up to high volume.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Medium maize color with moderate mousse. On the nose, this showed some toasty bread and rich, ripe fruit aromas. This was well-balanced and tasty on the palate, with the mature breadth of flavor expected of vintage champagne. This had only faint minerality and a residual hint of acidity, keeping it out of the top tier of vintage Champagne. However at $50 bottle, this has a good QPR and represents a huge upgrade over your favorite name-brand non-vintage champagne with a yellow label (for a similar cost). Enjoy over the next four years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Brought to a dinner. Small pour, decent temp. Liked this. Thought it was round and full with lots of minerality especially on the finish. Spouse said I should buy more which is always a plus!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
I am unfamiliar with this producer, and the small taste I had of this was disappointing. For a 2002, this was extremely simple and light. I hope this is indeed in a dumb phase.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
5/21/2017 - Doc90 wrote: 93 Points
Tasted blind. Powerful nose of peppery cologne, ryebread, and lemon curd. Fine bubbles. Toast palate, and very focused. This is turned up to high volume.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
12/25/2014 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 90 Points
Medium maize color with moderate mousse. On the nose, this showed some toasty bread and rich, ripe fruit aromas. This was well-balanced and tasty on the palate, with the mature breadth of flavor expected of vintage champagne. This had only faint minerality and a residual hint of acidity, keeping it out of the top tier of vintage Champagne. However at $50 bottle, this has a good QPR and represents a huge upgrade over your favorite name-brand non-vintage champagne with a yellow label (for a similar cost). Enjoy over the next four years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/23/2014 - rocknroller wrote: 90 Points
Monthly Tasting Group: Champagne and Sushi (Sushi Fix, Wayzata, MN): Light gold color. Lemon mousse, foamy, mineral, light, lime, sea shells. Nice finish with big minerality and some chalk. This was much better than a bottle a few months ago. Very nice. 90+pts.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/23/2014 - Bellissimo Likes this wine:
Brought to a dinner. Small pour, decent temp. Liked this. Thought it was round and full with lots of minerality especially on the finish. Spouse said I should buy more which is always a plus!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/10/2014 - galewskj wrote: 87 Points
I am unfamiliar with this producer, and the small taste I had of this was disappointing. For a 2002, this was extremely simple and light. I hope this is indeed in a dumb phase.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment