Notes after 3 hours open and it clearly was still improving. I like it a little better now than 7 months ago as I can detect a little more tannin and acidic structure, but the alcohol distraction is still a little beyond my range for ultimate enjoyment.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
I'm going to be a bit of a contrarian here. I dig this wine. It's not the best WW Syrah I've had but it's a good wine. Double decanted. 87 upon first taste and closer to a 90 after an hour. Savoury leather, earth & funk notes with some dark blue fruit. Nice with a veggie Forbidden rice bowl. Yes it'd be better with less oak but it's a great weekday drink for me.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Unfortunately, no change for the better compared to my first bottle, 8 months ago. Still a big wallop of oak to the face and a bodyshot of alcohol for good measure. Reminds me of the old days, drinking Tobin James ;0 But for $13, little to regret.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Notes after 8 hours open. Fully opaque ruby with very slow and lightly stained legs. Medium intensity bouquet: black berries, oak and popcorn butter, and definite hints of the signature funk of the area. Served blind, I'm sure I would call WA Syrah. I can't be as critical as the three before me here because I always expect a good dose of oak from the region, too. This did show steady improvement with aeration and I plan to wait another 6+ months before opening another. 5+10+15+7= 87
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
One of the more interesting failures I've drunk recently, to be honest. The best Rocks syrah I've had tends towards more of a Northern Rhône model, but this was seemingly designed to be more like a humongous Aussie shiraz - high alcohol, high extract, lots of oak, more more more. It's an intensely tiring, punishingly huge wine that tastes of nowhere in particular. That said, the quality is fine - it's not _bad_ bad, it's just unnecessary, unconvincing, and overall kind of a bummer.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
2/14/2023 - fingers wrote:
Notes after 3 hours open and it clearly was still improving. I like it a little better now than 7 months ago as I can detect a little more tannin and acidic structure, but the alcohol distraction is still a little beyond my range for ultimate enjoyment.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
8/2/2022 - rgujral Likes this wine: 89 Points
I'm going to be a bit of a contrarian here. I dig this wine. It's not the best WW Syrah I've had but it's a good wine. Double decanted. 87 upon first taste and closer to a 90 after an hour. Savoury leather, earth & funk notes with some dark blue fruit. Nice with a veggie Forbidden rice bowl. Yes it'd be better with less oak but it's a great weekday drink for me.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
7/15/2022 - fingers wrote:
Unfortunately, no change for the better compared to my first bottle, 8 months ago. Still a big wallop of oak to the face and a bodyshot of alcohol for good measure. Reminds me of the old days, drinking Tobin James ;0
But for $13, little to regret.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
12/20/2021 - fingers wrote: 87 Points
Notes after 8 hours open. Fully opaque ruby with very slow and lightly stained legs. Medium intensity bouquet: black berries, oak and popcorn butter, and definite hints of the signature funk of the area. Served blind, I'm sure I would call WA Syrah. I can't be as critical as the three before me here because I always expect a good dose of oak from the region, too. This did show steady improvement with aeration and I plan to wait another 6+ months before opening another.
5+10+15+7= 87
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
12/11/2021 - fullpour Does not like this wine:
One of the more interesting failures I've drunk recently, to be honest. The best Rocks syrah I've had tends towards more of a Northern Rhône model, but this was seemingly designed to be more like a humongous Aussie shiraz - high alcohol, high extract, lots of oak, more more more. It's an intensely tiring, punishingly huge wine that tastes of nowhere in particular. That said, the quality is fine - it's not _bad_ bad, it's just unnecessary, unconvincing, and overall kind of a bummer.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment