Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(8)

  1. WineGuyX

    WineGuyX

    1,797 Tasting Notes

  2. Cremuel

    Cremuel

    588 Tasting Notes

  3. I'd Rather Be Drinking Wine

    I'd Rather Be Dri…

    932 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (8) Avg Score: 92.7 points

  • Huge nose of fresh cracked pepper, sage, wintergreen, anise, Asian spice box, roasting meat and black cherry. Full-bodied and extremely forward, this is potent and lasting. Loads of blueberry, black cherry and berry, cassis, white and black pepper as well as some garden herbs, led by sage. This wine is huge, but has a semblance of balance with soft but evident tannins and somewhat high acidity. Very well made, this should age for 15+ years but most will likely prefer now. 95

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Pnp. Dark inky red. Blast of redcurrant, white pepper, acidity and some spices on the nose. Light, white pepper dash, Pinotesque, crunchy red currants, pepperyness comes through. Fresh and interesting. With a bit more air, the crisp red fruit continues, peppery tannins, and a fine structure for aging. Will hopefully gain weight as it ages.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Finesse and intricacy sum up this lighter-weight edition of SV. The pale red rim, then garnet outer circle of colour are tell tale signs, to an extent, that this is a more elegant year.

    The almost ethereal, wildy spicey and complex nose is one of the two striking features of this vintage. The aroma wheel keeps spinning. Pepper, charcuterie, a dusting of oak. Then dried rose petals, leaf and dried herb, with raspberry, darker cherries and deeper meat notes. Uber fragrant.

    The palate dances and swirls too. It’s only light-medium bodied but it doesn’t need to be more, for mine. What it has is subtle intensity and poise. The tannin/fruit balance is at once intricate and effortless. I found it totally compelling, coming back again and again to search for more answers - but it kept waltzing away around my palate.

    I don’t detect the greenery or grassiness that others see. Leafy yes, but not mulchy. I’m self conscious of my strong affiliation for this wine, winery and it’s creator that might deceive or filter the senses. But in cooler and relatively wet years like 2021, 2017 and 2012, my starting point is concern if not scepticism that the wine will live up to standard that kinder, benign years have set. I think 2021 makes the grade, for its beauty and style, although it’s shy of the top rank (a pretty high standard, in my tasting book).

    It’s a triumph of viticulture, rigorous fruit selection and delicate wine making. Is it heavily worked? Not sure. Yes there’s whole bunches. Clonakilla were early adoptors of this technique, not least due to a desire to fashion Burgundian elements in the wine, and remain masterful unlike most who fiddle with whole bunch.

    But the intricacy comes, for me, from skilful blending of different blocks on the Clonakilla site, that have differing clones, vine age, aspect and nose rings (one of those points is bogus, I think). And are matured in barrels and puncheons from different French coopers, with differing barrel age. Having been lucky once to taste those different components in the pre-blending scoring stage, it’s quite a mosiac from which the Cka team can pick to make up the final wine.

    How will it age? A tricky one. The SV tends to put on ‘weight’ and grow in the bottle as it ages. The 2017 is the closest analogue I can think of to the 2021. It looked slender on release. 2017 now looks to be growing in depth. It might be a slightly better vintage but I reckon the 2021 is the better wine. In ten years I think it will be majestically complex, graceful and still fresh. Not an 06 or 08 or 15 or 19, but divine regardless. That’s if you can resist drinking what you have now.

    2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • The nose is very interesting, with notes of spice, rose petal and dark fruit. The palate is dominated right now by black pepper and dark fruit with some toasted oak and some dark chocolate. This wine needs time in the bottle, probably at least 5-7 years. Plenty of fruit, acidity and tannin to lay this down. 93 for my palate today, but should pick up a couple points with some time in the bottle.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Ruby red with youthful purplish tinge, clear, transparent. Extremely clean, very expressive and pronounced nose of Turkish Delight, apricot nectar, abundance of white pepper. Palate is extremely clean, tart and lean acidity, white pepper, apricot nectar and kernel, redcurrant and cranberry. On the lighter side of medium-bodied, verging on austere for this wine. Some slightly stalky tannins but they will subdue with time. Much lighter than other vintages, so will this age as well? Maybe. Regardless, it is delicious drinking, albeit at a significant price.

    2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

View all 8 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Angus Hughson
    Clonakilla Shiraz Viognier 1994-2021 (Nov 2022), 11/1/2022, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Clonakilla Shiraz Viognier Red) Login and sign up and see review text.

JamesSuckling.com

  • By James Suckling
    10/4/2022, (See more on JamesSuckling.com...)

    (Clonakilla Shiraz Viognier Canberra District , Red, Australia) Login and sign up and see review text.

Halliday Wine Companion

The WINEFRONT

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and JamesSuckling.com and Halliday Wine Companion and The WINEFRONT.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×