No detailed notes, but I got a lot of oak upon first opening. After decanting for an hour or two the oak felt better integrated, but my overall impression wasn't as strong as with the last two bottles.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Dark in color and signature St Julien graphite, pencil notes on the nose and palate. Tannin is mostly but not all integrated. The wine lacks a little of the fruit to balance with the body and graphite notes and feels lean in the mouth than what one would expect.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
A second experience with the 2009 St. Pierre (this time tasted blind over the course of a day with and without food) generated similar conclusions to my last encounter with the wine in 2021. There's plenty of power and concentration to the '09 St. Pierre, the slightly jammy blackberry and black cherry fruit complemented by roast squab, pencil, and some slightly toasty oak that hasn't fully integrated. Yet it doesn't seem to show commensurate depth in the mouth and on the finish, leaving some questions that only time will answer. This is quite a serious, almost dour, rendition of St. Pierre which seems quite heavy, lacking the energy I'd like to see alongside that kind of heft. While I don't agree with the accolades this particular wine often receives, there's no doubt that the 2009 is an important illustration of the evolution of St. Pierre.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Quite evolved fruit, maybe even slightly roasted, nose but nothing alarming. The palate is full and ripe, very 2009 Left Bank, this nods to Cali Cabernet, ample black fruit, pepper, spices, chocolate and hints of mint. Matching tannin and acidity, fresh character despite the ripe fruit. Civilized and attractive finish. This vintage is more new world than a classic austere claret, enjoyable in its style and ready to go now after several hours of aeration.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
I thought this would be a helpful “cellar defender” but would have been better off left in the bottle. I’d say this is 5 years AT LEAST away from having any balance
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Château Saint-Pierre) Very dark red violet color; redolent, tart currant, pencil lead nose; tasty, tart currant, pencil lead palate; for early drinking; medium-plus finish (81% Cabernet Sauvignon, 19% Merlot)
NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and JancisRobinson.com and Winedoctor and The World of Fine Wine and View From the Cellar and Decanter and RJonWine.com.
3/2/2024 - JCGuthrie wrote:
No detailed notes, but I got a lot of oak upon first opening. After decanting for an hour or two the oak felt better integrated, but my overall impression wasn't as strong as with the last two bottles.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
3/2/2024 - overkloud wrote: 92 Points
Dark in color and signature St Julien graphite, pencil notes on the nose and palate. Tannin is mostly but not all integrated. The wine lacks a little of the fruit to balance with the body and graphite notes and feels lean in the mouth than what one would expect.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/25/2024 - englishman's claret wrote: 90 Points
A second experience with the 2009 St. Pierre (this time tasted blind over the course of a day with and without food) generated similar conclusions to my last encounter with the wine in 2021. There's plenty of power and concentration to the '09 St. Pierre, the slightly jammy blackberry and black cherry fruit complemented by roast squab, pencil, and some slightly toasty oak that hasn't fully integrated. Yet it doesn't seem to show commensurate depth in the mouth and on the finish, leaving some questions that only time will answer. This is quite a serious, almost dour, rendition of St. Pierre which seems quite heavy, lacking the energy I'd like to see alongside that kind of heft. While I don't agree with the accolades this particular wine often receives, there's no doubt that the 2009 is an important illustration of the evolution of St. Pierre.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/30/2023 - Lype Likes this wine:
Quite evolved fruit, maybe even slightly roasted, nose but nothing alarming. The palate is full and ripe, very 2009 Left Bank, this nods to Cali Cabernet, ample black fruit, pepper, spices, chocolate and hints of mint. Matching tannin and acidity, fresh character despite the ripe fruit. Civilized and attractive finish. This vintage is more new world than a classic austere claret, enjoyable in its style and ready to go now after several hours of aeration.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/25/2023 - DVill wrote: 90 Points
I thought this would be a helpful “cellar defender” but would have been better off left in the bottle. I’d say this is 5 years AT LEAST away from having any balance
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment