This has vastly improved: a tasty, smooth effort. On the simplistic side, it presented cedar and well composed dusty red fruit. I picked it from the cellar for drinking assuming I'd never had it before and unaware of the price point. After drinking I assumed it was in the $40 range...happily surprised at its evolution and my apparent brilliance in purchasing.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Again, very pleasant, good pinot twang, silky texture, medium-weight body. There's a bit of stern woodiness (toughness, not greenness) in the ground bass that distracts slighly on the finish - not sure if this is an artifact of vine age (young) or vintage, or if it would pass with aditional aging. For the price of about $20, however, only praise, no complaints.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
As others have said, a pleasurable Burgundy for the price. Drinking blind, my wife nailed Burgundy but thought this older, as a 2006. I did find this slightly green/under ripe for my tastes, but I do prefer Cali pinots. Smooth, with slightly high acidity and tannins and good length on the finish. This held up well to a Coq Au Vin. 13.5% ABV.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Showing prettily now right after opening, delicious cool Burgundy pinot twang, mellow mid-palate, good heft, silky texture, and the mildest of acid bites on the finish. I have yet to drink a bad red Santenay (or white). No rush to drink, but definitely okay to try one now.
RIP affordable red Burgundy.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
1/7/2018 - tarheel17 Likes this wine:
This bottle settled midway between the two prior. A nice enough quaff, but not exceptional. Drink now.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/29/2017 - tarheel17 wrote: 89 Points
This has vastly improved: a tasty, smooth effort. On the simplistic side, it presented cedar and well composed dusty red fruit. I picked it from the cellar for drinking assuming I'd never had it before and unaware of the price point. After drinking I assumed it was in the $40 range...happily surprised at its evolution and my apparent brilliance in purchasing.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/18/2015 - fitzi wrote:
Again, very pleasant, good pinot twang, silky texture, medium-weight body. There's a bit of stern woodiness (toughness, not greenness) in the ground bass that distracts slighly on the finish - not sure if this is an artifact of vine age (young) or vintage, or if it would pass with aditional aging. For the price of about $20, however, only praise, no complaints.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/15/2015 - GoBlue2002 wrote: 88 Points
As others have said, a pleasurable Burgundy for the price. Drinking blind, my wife nailed Burgundy but thought this older, as a 2006. I did find this slightly green/under ripe for my tastes, but I do prefer Cali pinots.
Smooth, with slightly high acidity and tannins and good length on the finish. This held up well to a Coq Au Vin.
13.5% ABV.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/14/2014 - fitzi wrote:
Showing prettily now right after opening, delicious cool Burgundy pinot twang, mellow mid-palate, good heft, silky texture, and the mildest of acid bites on the finish. I have yet to drink a bad red Santenay (or white). No rush to drink, but definitely okay to try one now.
RIP affordable red Burgundy.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment