Important Update From the Founder Read message >

Chablis Les Clos night + an addictive and most impressive Scheurebe BA

Tasted April 7, 2014 by octopussy with 595 views

Introduction

In a small group, we met to taste some wines blind. I was told in advance that there would be some Chablis Grand Cru Les Clos, which was all I knew (this was more than the other knew though). We started with five white wines, four Chablis Les Clos and a pirate (which I didn't know either). Then we went on to two red wines blind and then two sweet wines blind.

Flight 1 - First Bracket - Chablis Grand Cru Les Clos + a Pirate (5 notes)

We started with the Chablis. I wasn't allowed to participate in guessing what it is because I was told in advance. The first Brocard (2008) was a wee bit disappointing because it was so tart and austere that it simply was hard to drink that night. More bottle age should do good though as the underlying material seems excellent. The second Brocard (2007) was my favorite of all four Chablis, it was equally tart in the nose as the 2008, but so much better in the mouth, bright, open, inviting, delicious. The group guessed it right that wine no. 1 and wine no. 2 were the same wine from different vintages. Someone said Chablis, the others said yes, it could be Chablis, but didn't want to commit.

The first Fèvre (2006) was maybe a bit unexciting at this point, it was well balanced and everything seemed in the right place, but it lacked the extra-dimension that for example the 2005 had. The second Fèvre (2005) was the favorite Chablis of many on the table, but for me it came only second after the 2007 Brocard. It's an excellent wine though with great texture, nice balance and lots of finesse. The funny thing is that everyone on the table (except for myself) guessed that this would be the pirate wine. Many on the table took it for a Loire Sauvignon Blanc, which I thought was not absurd as the wine did indeed have some characteristics that the best Loire Sauvignon Blancs have.

For me it was clear though that the last wine is the pirate as it did indeed taste very differently from the rest. The 2007 Domaine de Chevalier Blanc was quite controversial, some people really detested it in the beginning, but liked it better and better with more air (it was opened some three hours in advance though). For me it tasted like Irn Bru, that Scottish soda, at first, but became more and more complex also with air. I wouldn't have though Sauvignon Blanc though. After all, what's really funny is that people took a Chablis for a Sauvignon Blanc and a 85% Sauvignon Blanc, 15% Semillon blend for a Chablis.

To sum it up, the 2006 Fèvre and the 2008 Brocard Les Clos still seemed way too young, but the 2005 Fèvre and the 2007 Brocard seemed ready to go, if still young as well. No prem-ox, not even signs of it. The 2007 Domaine de Chevalier was something special, really, and if it weren't so expensive I'd think about buying it more often.

White
2008 Jean-Marc Brocard Chablis Grand Cru Les Clos France, Burgundy, Chablis, Chablis Grand Cru
88 points
Light yellow. In the nose, lemon and lime zest, a bit phenolic, quite tart, white blossoms in the background. This seems a bit tight and is not really open. On the palate, it's phenolic and tart again, very strong acidity that sticks out quite a bit at this moment. Lemon notes in the finish, which is long and minerality driven. Good, but way, way, way too young.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White
2007 Jean-Marc Brocard Chablis Grand Cru Les Clos France, Burgundy, Chablis, Chablis Grand Cru
94 points
Light golden yellow with green reflexes. In the nose, this is a bit tart and at first a bit unwieldy. There are lemon aromas and notes of green fruit like gooseberry. An airy and somehow silvery aura surrounds the nose. On the palate, this is stunning, quite concentrated, compact, with quite strong acidity that, however, is better integrated than in the 2008, salty, bright citrus fruit. Very long finish with stunning minerality.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White
2006 Domaine William Fèvre Chablis Grand Cru Les Clos France, Burgundy, Chablis, Chablis Grand Cru
90 points
Medium yellow. In the nose, this is quite soft, maybe a bit too soft for my personal taste, ripe pear, green herbs, nutty and smoky notes, a tiny bit of terpentine. On the palate, it's a bit austere, bone dry, chalky, compact. There are pear notes again. The finish is quite long and full of minerality.
White
2005 Domaine William Fèvre Chablis Grand Cru Les Clos France, Burgundy, Chablis, Chablis Grand Cru
93 points
Medium yellow. In the nose, this is very, very fine, quite expressive, creamy, a bit herbal (tarragon, mostly), there are grassy notes, too, the some pear and quince. It's shimmering and sort of light and airy. On the palate, the greatness continues, this is elegant, fine, well balanced, very precise and clear, herbal again. Long finish with tonic notes. Great stuff, but still quite young.
White
2007 Domaine de Chevalier Blanc France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
91 points
Golden yellow. In the nose, it's creamy, spicy, there are ginger notes, notes of a certain lemonade (maybe Irn Bru), tangerine, licorice, a tiny bit of terpentine in the back end. The nose is a bit strange, but very compelling. On the palate, this is full, extremely mineralic on the mid-palate, there's good acidity, this fills the whole mouth. The finish is full of different citrus fruits, phenolic notes and minerality. Terrific. Got better and better.

Flight 2 - Second Bracket - 2002 Vosne-Romanée vs. 2002 Moulin-à-Vent (2 notes)

In the second bracket, we were served both wines blind and did not guess what it was. My guess was that we had two German Spätburgunder with a little age on them. It was mostly the smoked bacon notes on the first wine that led me to that (wrong) conclusion. Some others in the room said Burgundy Pinot Noir, someone said Northern Rhône Syrah, but nobody guessed the Diochon right as a Beaujolais. Actually, I wasn't excited about either of the wines, but I was alone with that opinion. Most in the group really liked both wines, but the Charlopin-Parizot VR better than the Diochon. In any case, the Diochon had aged really well and is far away from having to be drunk anytime soon. It is approachable though. I found the Charlopin-Parizot to be quite advanced already, it didn't have the firmness that I would have liked to see.

Red
2002 Domaine Diochon Moulin-à-Vent Vieilles Vignes France, Burgundy, Beaujolais, Moulin-à-Vent
87 points
Cloudy crimson colour. In the nose, there's beef broth, beef jerky, smoked bacon, only a bit of fruit in the background that ranges from cherry pits to dried figs. Really weird, I didn't like the nose much. On the palate, I liked this a lot, it's a bit strict, very mineralic, there's fine tannin and fine acidity, some blackberry fruit. It's quite long and tickles the tongue. I would have loved it if the nose was more appealing.
Red
2002 Domaine Philippe Charlopin Vosne-Romanée France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Vosne-Romanée
86 points
Plummy colour. In the nose, there are some animalic notes at first that blow off after some air contact, there's a sort of plummy fruit, lots of oriental spices, some forest strawberry. The fruit seems a tiny bit confected. On the palate, the alcohol sticks out a bit, it's good at first, but sort of breaks away on the mid-palate, it's a bit sweet. Expressive, but fairly short finish that leaves a dusty impression in the mouth.

Flight 3 - Third Bracket - Two 2002 sweet Scheurebes (2 notes)

We started the last bracket with the wine of the night without any doubt, the Andreas Laible Durbacher Plauelrain Scheurebe Beerenauslese 2002. The smell was seductive already, but once you took this liquid into your mouth it was like an explosion, like fireworks, like the sun rising and going down at the same time, heavenly, truly wonderful and hard to describe with words. We were all drooling over this wine, trying to lap up every last drop that there could be in the glass. We all concluded that we'd even work for free at the winery for a few days just to get the chance to get another half bottle of this magic potion to share between us. Actually, the Laible was meant to be the last wine of the night, but since it was not too late, our host got a half bottle of Alois Kracher Scheurebe TBA #10 2002. This was great as well, but it had a hard time after that Laible, it was sweeter, had less prominent acidity and just lacked this otherworldly extraterrestrial dimension that the Laible had. In any case, these were two outstanding wines to end the night.

White - Sweet/Dessert
2002 Andreas Laible Durbacher Plauelrain Scheurebe Beerenauslese Germany, Baden
98 points
Cloudy orange colour. In the nose, this is a tiny bit dusty, but there are wonderful honey notes (like Met, that honey wine), nutty notes, some fine botrytis, candied grapefruit. On the palate, this is perfect, it can't get better for me, this is incredibly sweet, but there's a wonderful bright acidity that balances the sweetness, there are apricot and peach notes, honey notes, this is incredibly concentrated, super precise, clear and bright. The finish is minute-long. This is a wine to pray for, almost too great to be true.
White - Sweet/Dessert
2002 Alois Kracher Scheurebe TBA #10 Zwischen den Seen Austria, Burgenland, Neusiedlersee
93 points
Amber colour. In the nose, this smells like concentrated pear juice, there are some dried apricots as well, nutty notes, raisins, some botrytis. It's appealing, very appealing in fact. On the palate, this is concentrated, very sweet, oily, but it finishes with enough acidity, freshness and spiciness to not get one-dimensional. The finish is long. Very, very good in fact.
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close