Thursday, March 31, 2022 - Not convincing. Maybe too young. Tasted side by side with the 164th (delicious) and 2008 (very promising but way too young). It lacks the complexity and elegance of the 164th. Acidity isa bit too high, and I was not convinced by the texture which is a bit rough at the moment. The structure and balance are good though, but it seems a solid step beyond the 164th. A good champagne overall, but quite simply not what you'd expect from Krug.
Post a Comment / View Vinum Deorum's profile
Comment posted by Seth Rosenberg:
3/31/2022 1:13:00 PM - Totally agree.