Saturday, January 9, 2016 - Perfectly mature, bready and yeasty notes, quite rich. Very enjoyable now but I don't think it's for the long haul.
1/9/2016 5:28:00 PM - I agree. 2002 seems much less than a vintage that is very impressive. Many falling apart. Im glad I didn't go deep on this vintage. 2004 and 2006 probably better to hold.
(see all 57 vintages)
Add Drinking Window
Comment posted by Champagneinhand:
1/9/2016 5:28:00 PM - I agree. 2002 seems much less than a vintage that is very impressive. Many falling apart. Im glad I didn't go deep on this vintage. 2004 and 2006 probably better to hold.