Lighter color for a zin in fact it was almost watery. nose had pepper coffee and leather. Taste was mild smooth and watery
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
Little nose, berry flavors, light no lasting aftertaste. Not unpleasant it not a great wine by any measure but won't throw it away either
Good, but my guess is it's on the back side of the drinking curve. Dark fruits with a little bit of spice. Nice weekday wine.
'06! A back vintage at this point. Wonder what is up. Shows some oak barrel, well made, cedar, touch of tannin, fresh. Rather clean and vibrant for a Zin at this price.
Fresh, bright berry fruit. Tasty, delicious, easy going. No clay, no serpentine soils. The wines are pretty much self-regulating. Not bad at $13.
(see all 8 vintages)
Add Drinking Window
8/6/2015 - Jwd12 wrote: 85 Points
Lighter color for a zin in fact it was almost watery. nose had pepper coffee and leather. Taste was mild smooth and watery
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/27/2012 - Jwd12 wrote: 90 Points
Little nose, berry flavors, light no lasting aftertaste. Not unpleasant it not a great wine by any measure but won't throw it away either
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/17/2012 - Trax wrote: 88 Points
Good, but my guess is it's on the back side of the drinking curve. Dark fruits with a little bit of spice. Nice weekday wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/19/2011 - Ben Christiansen wrote:
'06! A back vintage at this point. Wonder what is up. Shows some oak barrel, well made, cedar, touch of tannin, fresh. Rather clean and vibrant for a Zin at this price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/24/2011 - Ben Christiansen wrote:
Fresh, bright berry fruit. Tasty, delicious, easy going. No clay, no serpentine soils. The wines are pretty much self-regulating. Not bad at $13.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment