4/4/2007 I rated at 86 but had again on 4/10 after it had been opened for a day and it was much smoother, complex and interesting. Needs to breath apparently.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
4/21/2020 - rikipedia wrote:
Medium to deep gold.
Showing clear signs of evolution with an oxidative element, wet river stones and little fruit. Tired and past its best. 75
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/4/2007 - RobB wrote: 89 Points
4/4/2007 I rated at 86 but had again on 4/10 after it had been opened for a day and it was much smoother, complex and interesting. Needs to breath apparently.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment