Deep yellow color. Citrus and light oak on the nose. Not much in the way of acid left on this so it's a touch flaccid. Was a wine to drink young. Pleasant for some simple drinking but missing that bracing quality you'd hope for.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
No score - it's too old for that. Very faint and fading in early '17. Beautiful deep yellow color, tending towards amber. Hints of what was - you can recognize it was a well-made Chardonnay without too much oak. But not enough acid or overall leanness to keep it going this long.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
These have fallen off a bit since the initial bottles opened upon release. Still quite nice but it comes across a bit flabby. Could use a little more acidity to pull it together. Drink sooner than later.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Rocks, orange and shellfish/ocean notes. Shows signs of maturing but acidity is still very much present which keeps it fresh and balanced. Will probably not improve.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Not as impressive as previously, more watery and synthetic tasting, like a cheap, generic California chardonnay. Either I overscored this on release, or it has fallen apart a bit, or this bottle was just off.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Lioco Chardonnay Russian River Valley) Light yellow color; tart pear, pineapple nose; tart pear, tart pineapple palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish 91+ points (1st vintage with winemaker John Raytek; neutral 600 liter foudres; 12.8% alcohol)
NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and RJonWine.com.
6/13/2017 - H2OMansLibrary Likes this wine:
Deep yellow color. Citrus and light oak on the nose. Not much in the way of acid left on this so it's a touch flaccid. Was a wine to drink young. Pleasant for some simple drinking but missing that bracing quality you'd hope for.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/18/2017 - LesPaul wrote:
No score - it's too old for that. Very faint and fading in early '17. Beautiful deep yellow color, tending towards amber. Hints of what was - you can recognize it was a well-made Chardonnay without too much oak. But not enough acid or overall leanness to keep it going this long.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/8/2015 - Oskiwawa wrote: 88 Points
These have fallen off a bit since the initial bottles opened upon release. Still quite nice but it comes across a bit flabby. Could use a little more acidity to pull it together. Drink sooner than later.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/6/2015 - aekenback wrote: 90 Points
Rocks, orange and shellfish/ocean notes. Shows signs of maturing but acidity is still very much present which keeps it fresh and balanced. Will probably not improve.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/13/2014 - petitblanc wrote: 85 Points
Not as impressive as previously, more watery and synthetic tasting, like a cheap, generic California chardonnay. Either I overscored this on release, or it has fallen apart a bit, or this bottle was just off.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment