Tuesday Night Blind Tasting (Bin 75): Tasted blind. Lovely nose, red sour cherry fruit, feminine style, sweet finish, but with tannic grip. I initially called it Tuscan Sangiovese, but the group consensus was Nebbiolo and that group think swayed me.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Really earthy cherry flavours. Good freshness, 14% alcohol, firm but softening tannins, that support rather than overpower. There is of course tertiary leather here but at this juncture it is not overpowering the fruit. Medium plus weight. Long and complex. Drinking perfectly now, will become more tertiary from here but will last another decade.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
PNP from a restaurant list in Montalcino, While a very slight whiff of roasted fruit on the nose this is very good and drinking just fine right now if you are okay with the tannins still showing a bit on the finish. We had a '17 as well on this trip and the '12 is so much more a 'serious' wine with plenty of focus, structure, and life ahead of it while the '17 is so much about the ripe fruit and pleasure to drink right now. Both nice but I like the future of the '12. A-
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Very good and fully mature bottle, perhaps because the Milan restaurant kept it and other bottles stored at room temp. Full of mushrooms, balsamic, overripe plum, and some leather and tobacco. Not sure how bottles better kept might fair. This nine seemed accelerated in the against process but not spiked by it.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
3/5/2024 - Francophile1 Likes this wine:
Tuesday Night Blind Tasting (Bin 75): Tasted blind. Lovely nose, red sour cherry fruit, feminine style, sweet finish, but with tannic grip. I initially called it Tuscan Sangiovese, but the group consensus was Nebbiolo and that group think swayed me.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
8/13/2023 - Philip67 Likes this wine: 93 Points
Really earthy cherry flavours. Good freshness, 14% alcohol, firm but softening tannins, that support rather than overpower. There is of course tertiary leather here but at this juncture it is not overpowering the fruit. Medium plus weight. Long and complex. Drinking perfectly now, will become more tertiary from here but will last another decade.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/8/2023 - MC wrote:
PNP from a restaurant list in Montalcino, While a very slight whiff of roasted fruit on the nose this is very good and drinking just fine right now if you are okay with the tannins still showing a bit on the finish. We had a '17 as well on this trip and the '12 is so much more a 'serious' wine with plenty of focus, structure, and life ahead of it while the '17 is so much about the ripe fruit and pleasure to drink right now. Both nice but I like the future of the '12. A-
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
5/16/2023 - Montesquieu wrote: 94 Points
Very good and fully mature bottle, perhaps because the Milan restaurant kept it and other bottles stored at room temp. Full of mushrooms, balsamic, overripe plum, and some leather and tobacco. Not sure how bottles better kept might fair. This nine seemed accelerated in the against process but not spiked by it.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/14/2022 - LEEJV123 Likes this wine: 91 Points
Full, tannic, long, brooding. Absolutely not ready to drink, hold for another 5 to 15 years.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment