Gaillard uses plenty of new oak here, which is a high-risk strategy for a country wine. Luckily, it pays off. Transhumance dries the tongue for a second with a shade too much alcohol and wood, but then expands into a rich, warm flood of classic GSM flavor. It compares well with most Chateauneuf du Pape. The Languedoc minerality is relatively muted, but lingers afterwards, so it finishes as a Faugeres.
My bottle's condition was perfect - while nothing seemed in danger of fading, I could see no reason to wait another day to drink any bottles you might have.
Easily the best $20 wine I've had this year.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
decanted for about two hours: dark red/purple color, quite opaque. Nose of dark berries and black cherries, an herbaceous note (eucalyptus?) and some smoke and barnyard. tastes of darker fruits (plum/prune), herby note still there but seems a little licorice-y. medium finish with a little charcoal and the end. not as good as the bottle 6 or so months ago, but still very good. -- 90
Day 2: wish we had more left over. even better, everything more open. -- 92
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Je maintiens ma note mais le vin m'a semblé un peu mou... aéré puis carafé, je décelais une légère amertume non désirable dans le premier verre, j'ai cru que j'avais trop attendu mais cela s'est replacé ensuite. Couleur carmin foncé, opaque et assez épais. Nez discret.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
7/29/2014 - Mimesis Likes this wine: 92 Points
Gaillard uses plenty of new oak here, which is a high-risk strategy for a country wine. Luckily, it pays off. Transhumance dries the tongue for a second with a shade too much alcohol and wood, but then expands into a rich, warm flood of classic GSM flavor. It compares well with most Chateauneuf du Pape. The Languedoc minerality is relatively muted, but lingers afterwards, so it finishes as a Faugeres.
My bottle's condition was perfect - while nothing seemed in danger of fading, I could see no reason to wait another day to drink any bottles you might have.
Easily the best $20 wine I've had this year.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/14/2013 - guchl Likes this wine: 91 Points
decanted for about two hours:
dark red/purple color, quite opaque. Nose of dark berries and black cherries, an herbaceous note (eucalyptus?) and some smoke and barnyard. tastes of darker fruits (plum/prune), herby note still there but seems a little licorice-y. medium finish with a little charcoal and the end. not as good as the bottle 6 or so months ago, but still very good. -- 90
Day 2: wish we had more left over. even better, everything more open.
-- 92
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/7/2012 - czar33 wrote: 88 Points
Je maintiens ma note mais le vin m'a semblé un peu mou... aéré puis carafé, je décelais une légère amertume non désirable dans le premier verre, j'ai cru que j'avais trop attendu mais cela s'est replacé ensuite. Couleur carmin foncé, opaque et assez épais. Nez discret.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/7/2011 - Tony Molester wrote:
Agree with notes below, however not exactly a wine of finesse in my opinion. More a smooth vin de soif.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/16/2010 - czar33 Likes this wine: 88 Points
Concentré, pas trop tannique mais assez pour vieillir, beau nez, bonne longueur.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment