Interesting wine for me. I have not had a 10+ year old Chorey before. The nose has cranberry, spice and sous-bois notes. On taste a bit lean with the fruit faded but still firm tannins - kind of surprising for 2002. Decent intensity and acidity on taste although the fruit faded;however, as time goes on the fruit notes on the nose and taste come out - backward wine. Long length though. On the finish a bit of oak tannin. For some reason I like it - though as I state some of the notes it does not sound so enticing. There is something still alive in the wine and seductive about the flavors. Interesting.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Two years ago I drank my other bottle of this village wine and gave it an 84, saying it needed more time. It did. I enjoyed my second bottle more, hence the upgrade. Light, clear reddish-purple color. Mostly smoke and earth on the medium nose, but a mouth full of cherries and red fruit with a slightly acidic melon tang. Tannins in the background, giving it good structure. Decently long finish. An old world, fruit-backward pinot meant to be paired with food.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
3/17/2013 - ashegedyn wrote:
Interesting wine for me. I have not had a 10+ year old Chorey before. The nose has cranberry, spice and sous-bois notes. On taste a bit lean with the fruit faded but still firm tannins - kind of surprising for 2002. Decent intensity and acidity on taste although the fruit faded;however, as time goes on the fruit notes on the nose and taste come out - backward wine. Long length though. On the finish a bit of oak tannin. For some reason I like it - though as I state some of the notes it does not sound so enticing. There is something still alive in the wine and seductive about the flavors. Interesting.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/18/2010 - gordoyflaca wrote: 91 Points
I thought this was nice stuff. Relatively thin body. nice floral nose. Light cherry fruit with Washington state red apple, almost cidery. Interesting.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/23/2008 - JBBridge wrote: 86 Points
Two years ago I drank my other bottle of this village wine and gave it an 84, saying it needed more time. It did. I enjoyed my second bottle more, hence the upgrade. Light, clear reddish-purple color. Mostly smoke and earth on the medium nose, but a mouth full of cherries and red fruit with a slightly acidic melon tang. Tannins in the background, giving it good structure. Decently long finish. An old world, fruit-backward pinot meant to be paired with food.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/8/2006 - JBBridge wrote: 84 Points
Good village pinot noir. Could use some more time.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment