Mid weight, freshness with some brioche; very nice. Nice. 87

Superb acidic cut, medium persistence. Better than the Angeline. Very nice. 89-90

Aromatic, delicate slightly floral; well balanced, nice acidic cut. 88

Stunning nose, even with a small pour, complex, deep, bruised apples; palate is a stellar blend of high acidity and aged brioche. Lovely wine. 93-94+

OMG nose with caramelized peach, apricot; palate balanced but with medium sweetness, medium acidity. Nose>palate but both excellent. 92

From 375. Less aromatic; palate is thick, sweet, but lacking deep complexity. Nice. 88

Some spice but lacking complexity and depth. Disappointing for Williams Selyem. 85

Nose is more roses than tar, a bit of funk; palate is light bodied but polished, high tannins but approachable; medium finish. This comes across as a blend of traditional and slightly polished modern. Definitely needs more time, but lacks the next level excitement for me. 90

Aromatic, complex, red fruit and mulch, roses; palate is light bodied, high youthful tannin, traditional in style; medium-long finish. Lovely. 93+

Aromatic, roses, red fruit, high aromatics; palate is light bodied, high youthful tannins, smooth and well balanced; medium finish. This is quite nice, very well put together, would love this over a meal. 92-95+

Aromatic with red fruits and some purple plums, a core of minerality, slight spice; really prominent tannins, well balanced fruit, needs 15-20 years from the vintage. Should be lovely one day. 93-96+

Elegant black fruit, aromatic, well balanced; full bodied, plenty of balanced fruit, surprisingly approachable tannins; long finish. Exceptional in a way that is balanced and not showy. 95+

Black fruit, some spice; palate is full bodied, rich, lovely black fruit, balanced; medium finish. Nice. Balanced alcohol and medium-plus acid. 89

Ruby-purple; aromatic black fruit, balanced; palate is ripe but balanced, young, approachable tannins; medium finish. Nice Cab. 91

Stunning nose of spice, red fruit, earth, Asian spice; palate is light bodied, low tannins but still with some structure, medium-plus acidity, youthful red fruit; medium finish. This is good now with a lot of potential. 92-94

Less aromatic than the 2014 60 ouvres, a bit deeper and richer black fruit; palate is medium bodied, darker fruit; finish is medium length. OK...90

Not that aromatic, but balanced, red fruit; palate is medium bodied, flavorful red fruit, balanced medium-plus acid; medium finish. Very nice but needs a few years. 90-91

Skin contact fruilano. Unremarkable and kind of bland. 81

Moderately aromatic nose with some richness, slightly oxidative; palate is rich, but with good acidity, slightly oxidative; medium finish. Needs some time and a bit more thoughtful meditation to appreciate. 90

Moderately aromatic; palate is a bit young and rough, some fruit but not much complexity today. 85

Smoother more elegant red fruit, well balanced, good food wine, but not super-complex. 87

Aromatic, red fruit, good depth and complexity, really lovely nose; palate is medium bodied, red fruit, simpler than the nose; medium finish. Nice, but the palate falls off a bit. 90-91

500 mL. Aromatic, slightly sherried, nutty; palate is fresh, light to medium bodied, some sweetness but overall a light minerally, slightly salty palate; finish is medium-plus. 90-91

Caramel colored; rich nose with toffee and caramel; palate is rich, full bodied, some sweetness; medium finish. Not bad but for its age it doesn’t have enough complexity. 91

Not too aromatic; sweet and balanced but lacking complexity; short-medium finish. 88

Tawny; nutty, slight alcohol lift; palate is medium-full bodied, good acidity, not as much complexity as expected. 90

Nice overall but too late in the evening. Nose>palate. 85

A bit spicy, good fruit; palate is full bodied, young. 89-90

Nose is highly aromatic, berries; but the palate is a bit overripe. 88