Important Update From the Founder Read message >

Tasting Notes for gnosis

(662 notes on 556 wines)

1 - 50 of 662 Sort order
Red
2/16/2024 - gnosis wrote:
Very good, but not a stellar wine. However, the very excellent 04 vintage shows through. This seems only a few years old, with vibrant acidity and fruit. Wow. Not stellar, but hard to believe it is that old! And yet it is better than really young. A winner, but kind of a unique on.
Red
2006 Château Belgrave Haut-Médoc Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
Friendly right away, nice aromas, resolved tannins, fruit. I see wine on an arc, ascending and descending slowly. This is on descent and is pleasant. I wish I had drank some of my bottles the past few years, but still enjoyable now. Going to drink up soon though.
Red
2005 Château Belair St. Émilion Grand Cru Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
Still good, mostly fruit driven, like aged cherry fruit, some cola notes, a little menthol early but maybe not after open. Basically good fruit base, more cherry, less cocoa and coffee of Left Bank. A little tannin taste, but resolved. Drinking well and easy. At times it reminds me of an aged bigger Burgundy with the fruit profile. Good. 13% not hot either. Not stellar but a solid enjoyable bottle. After open hours, half bottle, it still seems young. Again not stellar, but good and younger notes.
Red
6/4/2023 - gnosis wrote:
Firstly, I didn't necessarily mean to open this. Originally, I bought it thinking I might open it one day. Last week I put up some expensive wines to auction. This was one of them. However, as I stood the bottle up, the cork dropped down. Ugh. Guess I'll have to open it now.

Well mostly I agree with the recent notes. You have to like old wine, as some will not like it at this stage. For the Happy Few, the rewards are glorious. It is definitely alive and well at 71 years of age.

Let's walk through it. A good bottle, no leaks, solid capsule.

Eye, like cola, but tinge more red, clean, but this must have been a solid wine in its day.

Nose. On opening, lots of varnish. After hours, less varnish and more stewed tomato and jam, but not in a sweet way. Varnish, some. A very buried whiff of espresso. Earth, leather, damp wood, all there.

Palate. The attack is very suave, nice old integrated tennins, low acid attack. Good acidity. If you plugged your nose, you'd be surprised by the acidity still, but it is only a supporting player. Coating.

Aromas and finish. Dry fruit without the sugar. Old wood notes. Both persist a long time. A whiff of orange on the end.

It might not be an immediate pleasure bomb - but I guarantee you, you also will not be able to put it down.

That is the crux of old wine. And who after tasting the old, would want the new?

Day 2. Half the bottle was not poured out and was immediately sealed with Vacuvin after opening. That seemed to have worked well, because the wine was not too tired, and was also decanted.

Mostly the same, but way less varnish and more actual, sweeter stewed fruit. A bit less acid too. Only a little sediment. Very pleasant, more just to drink on its own. Tastes way younger, as well. Very cool experience, amazing.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
Mmm, delicious! Straight up strawberry jam, hint of cola, and a little bit of limestone. Just enough acid and light resolved tannins. Pure pleasure on its own, and sure it would hold up to lighter foods too. Glad to have more.
White
1999 Bonneau du Martray Corton-Charlemagne Corton-Charlemagne Grand Cru Chardonnay (view label images)
My experience was pretty much ditto of what Chekib M wrote on 10/8. Not for everyone at this stage, but depth and length that were really enjoyable. Surprising acidity still, which gave it good structure. Coincidentally, I also had it with sea scallops and steamed cauliflower (not planned), and it was a great match. It definitely benefited from at least an hour of breathing or decanting.
White - Sparkling
It just occurred to me that this reminded me of Selosse, an oxidized style perhaps. Another feather in the cap. I will buy more of this!
White - Sparkling
I would agree with recent tasters and add after a few years the following: the bubbles are larger at first and settle into finer bubbles later. There is an oxidized note of age, which I like, and a deeper gold color to the wine. This is the first Cava, GR or other, that if you served me, I would have guessed was Champagne. Tell me this is BdB and I'd believe it. There are two advantages for me: price, it is lower than Champagne; and two, it is Not Champagne. Want to show someone what Cava can do?? The grapes are all indigenous Spanish Cava ones, Macabeo, Xarel.lo, and Perellada. An Ace for Spain!
Red
This was a pleasant surprise. It is showing very well, all things considered. Serious. structure, definite age and burnished profile, but delicious, long, and bouquet! If you open it, drink it, it will not save. And it mutates. At first is this Bordeaux or Burgundy? (as aged Rioja does). But it settles on aged Bordeaux. Cedar, spice, supple leather, what is that dark dried fruit? Hmm. Definite age and oxidized notes; but if you love what that brings a wine, this one is as one taster said, singing. I quite agree. I don't give points, but at its highs, I'd say it has to be over 90. I will definitely restock my cellar with this and aim to sit on them. Very enthusiastically thumbs up!
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
Good but a little disappointing, a bit muted, older, just not hitting on the cylinders it should be. Resolved tannins, cola eye, still pleasant, but has lost verve that would make it more enjoyable. Could be bottle variation at this point. The '03 Barbaresco was much better. Will see with next bottle which I will open soon. Well made juice though, would buy again.
Red
This bottle is singing to me tonight. I had an '03 Barolo from this producer which just seemed muted. This one still has fruit and flowers, and resolved tannins and balanced acidity. Shows bricking a bit, but such a nice subtle mouthfeel and clean finish. Very happily surprised, and hard not to finish it all! One more bottle, so shall see. I would not wait. Maybe some variation in bottles at this age. Will check on another Barolo too and see where it is. This is delightful.
Red
Well, my last bottle, and patience was rewarded. This is one of the best aliagnicos that I've had, or that I remember. I'll certainly seek it out again. This wine at this stage shows bricking and that damp earth minerality on the nose, medium eye almost. Tannins resolved and almost sweet with enough grip to keep things together. Almost reminds me of aged Barbaresco or an aging Pinot in a way. Must not have a lot of intrusive wood. Very pleasant, a lot of sediment, a pleasure down to the last grainy drop.
Red
I probably should have gotten to this earlier. A taster said in 2018 he felt it was at its peak. I think it is slightly over, but is enjoyable, especially with food. It is dark, full, resolved tannins, less fruit but has body, and woody notes. Reminds me of a dark Bordeaux right now. I probably like this better younger with prettier notes to it, but still was good. I might even like the regular VN better too, or as much. Will get more in the future, I'm sure.
Red
2009 Fontodi Chianti Classico Chianti Classico DOCG Sangiovese (view label images)
Didn't keep notes, and drank over 2 days. Thought it was probably better before, stewed fruit, resolved tannins, a little oxidation. Similar to last taster. Would drink sooner next time.
Red
2005 Château Brillette Moulis en Médoc Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
Drinking quite well. Still has fruit to it, resolved dusty tannins, and lighter on the leather and aged, meaty notes of Bdx. Still def is Bdx. I expected a darker wine, but I find the body and balance quite nice. Not as fruity as some might suggest. Deep ruby and can be enjoyed by the glass, although I had it with dinner. Half for tomorrow. Pretty much poured a glass and sipped for a while before dinner. Didn't seem to need a ton of decanting. Good QPR, I'd buy again.
Red
So many people all saying it is in a great spot - it is! Perhaps has traded an element of new for old, but it is supple, dry, friendly, full on the palate, and dusty on the finish. Fully enjoyable with fruit, structure, and elegance. Leans more Rioja than Ribera in a way, or a mid-way point. A very interesting and liked one it is.
Red
In 2017 I said I'd drink my other bottle (this one) soon, only I didn't until now. I am glad too: this is much more enjoyable to me now. It has transformed quite a bit. I pretty much agree with the last taster. What was smoky and meaty before is pretty much gone, tannins are fine, and there is good acidity. It does benefit from decanting a fair amount. For me it started to settle in after an hour. The body is still medium, but it is more in balance with fresh acidity, and light tannins. Red cherry fruit (and berries, yes last taster), light chalky notes, and very light spice. Nice clean length too. Before it definitely needed meat IMO. Now after ample airing it is pleasant on its own, or with cheese, or again with meat, etc. I'll buy again and plan on sitting on them, at least for my taste.
Red
I agree with most recent reviews. I had heard about corked bottles or premox, so I was concerned, but this bottle is flawless. Mostly I key into the more traditional Bordeaux flavors to it, even if it has also has some modern aspects. Many point out, so-called modern or traditional styles when young tend towards each other as they age. Anyway, I was very pleasantly surprised by this. It is a wine now that I enjoy. Resolved tannins, dark stewed fruit, but definitely earthy leathery notes laid over that. I do get the olive tapenade. Tell-tale Bordeaux notes that I enjoy. A bit of dirt in the glass. Good with food; but for Bdx fans, I found it enjoyable enough on its own due to very soft resolved tannins with some supple fruit. Heat, yes, but seems balanced still with acidity and supple fruit. In a good spot and quite enjoyable with a small steak dinner. The rest for dinner tomorrow. It seems to be holding up, suggesting it will keep for a while yet. I'll be pretty tempted to drink the second bottle sooner than later though. I forget the price I paid, but from memory this is quite a good value. I'll buy again.
3 people found this helpful Comment
White - Sparkling
Light pale Champagne character with yeasty notes. Subdued and not as BdN heavy as I would have thought. A crowd pleaser and a little one dimensional. Not bad.
White
Mmm, delicious, poised, aged Savennières. Clear eye of deep gold-copper, shows its age. Notes from memory, subdued nose, cider, apple, some mineral. Lively enough acidity, but broad on the palate. A bit reminiscent of aged white Burgundy, but different flavor profile. Cider, yeast, stone, butter, white flowers. Very pleased with this. Will keep another bottle for a while.
Red
Hmm...better review than latest ones. Opened (screw cap), and ready for business, and no "bubble gum". That one confuses me, I don't get it. This could be a dead-ringer for Southern Rhône Syrahs that I like. Aromatic and expressive nose, wet stones, earth, kirsch, blackberry, plum, some spice, a light bit of leather even, but mostly fruity notes. Maybe a bit of soapy flower petals, in a good way. Dark purple-crimson eye in the glass. Not a lot of tannin here. Some astringency on the finish, but pleasant and tart by the glass. Guessing it will shine with food too. Thumbs up, it exceeded my expectations - but, I paid $12, not $30+ it is normally priced at. Worth it either way.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
1/5/2017 - gnosis wrote:
I was surprised that this wine seemed medium body and intensity, a bit hot at 14%, low tannin. I think it is at the end of it's drinking window. I think it was probably better young. Decent fruit, meat, smoke, red cherry fruit, but light fruit. Will drink other bottle now. Medium to lighter intensity.
Red
Interesting and delicious blend. Round and fruity, medium body, good lingering fruit. With all those grapes, it has various berries and red fruits swirling. Medium ruby eye, light soft tannins. A fun Rosso, will buy again.
White
A surprise, a close out of 2012 Riesling, but from Santa Lucia Highlands? Yes, and it is pretty good. 12% alc but still slightly sweet. It has aged sweet Riesling notes of baking spices and apple, yet still enough acid and verve to make it yummy. The acid is soft though. The nose is young-ish and bordering on petrol. I'd guess this was a Mosel with years on it. It is not highly complex or long, but pretty darn good. Hmmm, Riesling from Monterey? I am impressed.
White
I was happy to find this basic level Riesling Trocken from a favorite producer. It did not disappoint for the price ($17 full retail). A few years on now, but I didn't notice any age, other than it is probably more integrated. White peach, mandarin orange, light somewhat chalky earth, totally dry and 12%. Good vibrant acidity, which his wines tend to have. Lingering fruit and some light coconut notes at the end. Not highly complex, but it's got more going on than others at this price. Will buy again. Thumbs up.
White - Sparkling
Nice, pinot driven, yum, not too yeasty, good length.
White - Sparkling
Good for the price, nice pinot driven champagne.
Red
Drank well, starting to show age with complexity of bouquet. Still ruby and fruity. Yum.
Red
Wow, not what I expected. Just pure aged dry dusty fruit. No meatiness, it almost seems younger this way. Not a lot left though, so in last phase. Interesting development over the years. Not expensive, not epic, but quite good, and definitely so for the price. Dry earthy red wine now, some garrigue. I like now too.
Red
The first time with this particular cuvée from this producer, who I already like. Good quality, at first meatier notes, good blend of fruits, garrigue, nice tart acidity and some tannin. With age, it shines with food. The finish ends with lengthy red fruit and lingering acidity. Thumbs up.
White
Different yet than before. Evolved with golden eye, pure clean fruit on nose, not oxidized, more cooked fruit coming through along with deeper yellow grapes, stonefruit, mineral, nice acidity. Less powerful yet different, possibly classier. Quite enjoyable at this stage.
Red
This certainly hung in there well for a decade. Drinking well now with room to go yet. It improved slightly after opening, but it is a simpler wine. Good stuff, great value, I will buy again.
Red - Sweet/Dessert
Quite delicious and original. Red wine, cloyingly sweet in a good way, tons of spice. Delish. Thumbs up.
White - Sweet/Dessert
Probably better before, aged but not oxidized or off notes. Not as vibrant and the sugar is partly absorbed with less acidity. Pleasant, apricot notes, not bad.
White
Mmm, so good. The age has made it rounder, but there is nice acidity. 13.5%, so it is dry, but the fruit and alcohol almost seem like there is a hint of sweetness. Lovely aromatics, balance, and finish. Thumbs up!
Red
Nice and enjoyable now. I like it better today, with more integration of the acidity, which gives it more supple character. Light spice, good combination of elements for the price. Would buy again.
Red
There ya go, smoothing out, as I had thought. Nice suave character coming in. Fruit, low tannin, some wood spice, that's Rioja.
Red
8/8/2015 - gnosis wrote:
About the same as last time. Not really my style of Pinot Noir. Hanging in there.
Red
8/8/2015 - gnosis wrote:
This bottle was a bit awkward. It seemed tart, disjointed, etc. I was hoping for more suave character with age. Might be too old, or too young to be there yet. Will have to wait and see I guess.
Red
Good bottle, vibrant cherry-cranberry fruit, candied, with light damp earth and leather. Burgundian minerality. In the Zone. Yum.
White - Off-dry
Good, but not as good as I remembered. Could be age or variation. Decent acidity, but not quite as sharp as I would have liked. Seemed a little flat, although good fruit. No petrol, a definite fatness, and aromas of coconut. This bottle was not a fave, but it was tasty.
White
Good typical AOC Chablis. Crisp, mineral, etc. Will buy again.
White
Nice Kabinett, good fruit, classic stylings. Not spectacular, but good solid choice. Yum.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
Nice showing, integrated, medium dark for OR pinot. Some meat, smoke, and earth notes over the red cherry fruit. Nice acidity that props it up but not unfriendly. Winery direct, decent price. I'd buy again.
Red
Wow, this was worth the wait. It definitely benefitted from the age. Crimson eye, funky, medicinal nose, with a complex bouquet of herbs, earth, mature fruit. Resolved tannins and good grippy texture. Lingering mature aged fruits, red, currants, red forest berries, leather, menthol, etc. Long length on the finish. Mmmm. Quite an interesting bottle for the price. Thumbs up!
White - Off-dry
Oh my gosh good today; but I think that is partly my mood. It tastes great, with nice acidity, layered spicy Riesling-ness, and a light sweetness. Don't be thrown off by the sweetness, the acidity balances it. Lovely.
Red
Wow! This was a surprise, man. I thought I knew what I was in for; but no way. Is this Chianti? Is this dark Burgundy? Both. Yet, it is Rioja purely. Nose of blood, iodine, earth, ferns, kirsch, burried forest berries. Ruby eye. Suave Rioja attack of low tannin, balanced acidity (lower), all equal. Mmm. A little cedar wood in the background. The fruit comes together and coats the tongue with the light tannin. Long mid palate and lingering fruit clench and dusty aromas. Thumbs way up on this!!
Red
5/30/2015 - gnosis wrote:
flawed
Upon opening it smelled corky, not grossly corked, but the corkiness overshadowed it. Underneath, it is of a more medium intensity, perhaps lighter for Barbera. No tannins, some prettiness, but hard to see now under cork taint. Could be a pretty Barbera. Hmm, I guess I'd give it a try again.
Red
The second bottle was better. Nice combination of aged fruit, tannin, and acidity, giving and overall unctuousness that age brings. Good stuff.
1 - 50 of 662
More results
  • Tasting Notes: 662 notes on 556 wines
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close