Important Update From the Founder Read message >

Comments on my notes

(18 comments on 13 notes)

1 - 13 of 13 Sort order
White
2020 Tiare Collio Sauvignon
Well, this is something different! Just off six weeks at the Gulf eating seafood with various Sauvignons including Sancerre, Pouilly-Fumé, Quincy, one Quivira, and mostly New Zealand. Back home tonight, first taste of this Italian contender. Profile on both nose and palate unlike any of the others; impossible to guess the provenance. "Best in the world" at some international competition, they say. Well, it's got me intrigued. Will drink with dinner tonight, let the remainder coalesce in the fridge overnight, see what tomorrow brings, and report anything noteworthy. Apparently I bought a case, so maybe a long way to go between tonight and a final verdict. "Promising!"
  • Vinomane commented:

    4/25/22, 8:04 PM - See above.

Red
2001 La Rioja Alta Rioja Gran Reserva 904 Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo
4/2/2022 - Yapdiver wrote:
flawed
Unfortunately not very good. Smelled fantastic on the nose, but had a noticeable strange taste in the mouth. The day after that strange taste had developed onto the nose too. Maybe this wine can’t be stored for 20 odd years?
  • Vinomane commented:

    4/17/22, 5:37 PM - Harley is right. Just a baby now. Wait 20 years if you are young enough to do so.

White
2019 Domaine François Cotat Sancerre Les Caillottes Sauvignon Blanc
9/28/2020 - jviz wrote:
flawed
Lacking in fruit and acidity. Didn’t have the stuffing to match with oysters and mignonettes.

With more experience with Cotat, I’m wondering if this had travel shock or was just a poor bottle
  • Vinomane commented:

    4/16/22, 8:53 AM - Bet the main problem here is not bottle shock, nor a bad specimen, but simply that you drank it too young. F. Cotat Caillottes of ANY vintage needs 3-5 years to start revealing itself. Shock undoubtedly a contributing factor in this case. Bad bottle very unlikely. I have drunk this wine in quantity from all vintages released in the past 15 years and NEVER had a bad specimen.

Red
2001 Faustino Rioja I Gran Reserva Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo
4/29/2020 - Vinomane Does not like this wine:
84 points
Ridiculously overhyped on release, but I went long owing to low price, even once suggesting that other do the same. Well, after 6-8 bottles, my view has changed. Yet again, dull, turgid, pruny. Yes, it has barnyard, but with nothing elegant to balance. Given the vintage, really no excuse for making such a mediocre Gran Reserva. Will weigh in on this again only if some future bottle turns out to be more than just passably drinkable on a gloomy weeknight.
  • Vinomane commented:

    4/29/20, 5:41 PM - Quite possible, yes. I bought both original release and more much later, after tasting. All are racked without reference to acquisition date. Thanks for noting this fact.

  • Vinomane commented:

    4/29/20, 6:36 PM - Thanks for the detail, which I will bear in mind. Unfortunately, tonight's example was #45,415 -- a comparatively low number. I will admit that it's voluptuous. Who knows, 20-30 years, it may show refinement as well. But by then I would be drinking only the 2001 CVNE Imperials and LRA 890s.

  • Vinomane commented:

    5/2/20, 11:52 AM - Good point. Next bottle I will decant and leave overnight. 19 years is still way young for any traditional 2001 vintage gran reserva.

Red
2016 Château de Beaucastel Châteauneuf-du-Pape Red Rhone Blend
6/11/2019 - Vinomane wrote:
100 points
Potential 100-point wine. The harmony and integration exceed any Chateauneuf ever tasted, including classic vintages of Beaucastel. Maybe if drunk beside the Hommage it would be downgraded to 98; we won't know for another decade-plus. Chateauneuf is a "rustic" wine in general, but not this one. And you don't even feel the 14.5% alcohol. As a bonus, it's quite possible the 2016 will never shut down, but just keep gaining complexity as time passes. Superb.
  • Vinomane commented:

    8/5/19, 1:45 PM - When tasting vins de garde (collectable wines), you are necessarily projecting the future, since these wines are made, sold, and stored entirely for FUTURE drinking. All of the world's greatest wines taste terrible on release because they need 20+ years in bottle to develop into what they were built to become. Your job as critic/collector is to make your best guess concerning just WHAT they will become.

  • Vinomane commented:

    9/24/19, 2:38 PM - I am writing for collectors and you are looking for advice on present consumption. OK, I strongly recommend this particular wine for present consumption. Since it's a 100-pointer today, go buy some and drink it up and thoroughly enjoy yourself.

Red
2013 Domaine de Montille Bourgogne Pinot Noir
2/6/2019 - Brett H Likes this wine:
88 points
Nice, but I was expecting more. Perhaps I’m too late to the party - some tannins are still there and the acidity is pleasing, but the fruit is fading. The nose has a stalkiness that I really enjoyed.
  • Vinomane commented:

    2/12/19, 9:01 AM - This is said to be declassified Volnay.

White
2014 Nanclares y Prieto Albariño Coccinella Rías Baixas
3/10/2018 - Vinomane Likes this wine:
93 points
First taste of this super-rare Albariño, not currently available in U.S. in any vintage. Tremendous fruit development with no actual sweetness. Strong acidity gives it just enough balance. Some length on the palate with room for 2 years further development in the bottle. Clearly in the top tier for the region. Try it if you ever see it.
  • Vinomane commented:

    7/17/18, 7:48 PM - That's an understatement. Yesterday I claimed the only 3 bottles of the 2016 known to me, apart from the three at Sepia in Chicago, that is, for which I have also spoken. With a total production of 267 bottles per vintage for the whole world, I'd say you're being wildly optimistic.

Red
2001 La Rioja Alta Rioja Viña Ardanza Reserva Especial Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo
9/13/2016 - Old School Fan Likes this wine:
92 points
Terrific bottle of Ardanza! This bottle was dominated by fruit and spice notes showing red cherry, orange peel, cranberry, nutmeg, leather and tobacco. Classic traditional Rioja sour acid with just an faint hint of dill, vanilla, coconut from the oak. Pretty wine, so easy to drink!!

I've been struggling with La Rioja Alta over the past few years. Several bottles (not all bottles) of Ardanza, Arana and Alberdi have been absolutely undrinkable. They've been lifeless, limp wines wines with little/no fruit dominated by overpowering notes of American oak (dill, cedar and vanilla) as if the bottles were slightly corked. For example, in a case of Alberdi, 7 of the 12 bottles were this way while 5 were absolutely terrific. For 5 bottle of 2004 Ardanza, 2 were "flat" and undrinkable but 3 were good. Very strange.

Has anyone else been finding similar problems with LRA?
  • Vinomane commented:

    12/23/16, 8:26 PM - Ardanzas need 30 years, 904 40 years, 890 50 years, and Arana and Alberdi 20+ years. Fudge all you want, but that is the bottom line.

Red
2010 E. Guigal Côte-Rôtie Brune et Blonde Syrah
7/18/2015 - gravedee wrote:
I don't drink many Cote-Rotie wines and this is the first one of any quality that I can remember. I was somewhat disappointed by this -- I guess I had my hopes set too high. I don't know how much viognier is in this - but I have to assume a lot because the acidity was way too high for my taste. I can appreciate the quality and complexity but either it's the style that I'm not liking, or this is too highly wound and not ready to drink. Either way, I won't be going back.
  • Vinomane commented:

    10/4/15, 10:02 AM - Definitely drunk too young. Needs another 5-15 years to develop its finished profile.

Red
1982 Faustino Rioja I Gran Reserva Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo
2/1/2014 - magyarsvensk wrote:
89 points
I am almost incredulous that this is a 30+ year old wine. Barely any sediment, deep garnet, clear meniscus. Fake bottle or maybe just stored in a very cold cellar? The color and lack of sediment are vexing. Good bouquet with perfume, baked bread, fruit brambles. Vanilla, raspberries and red currants on the palate. Long finish with an orange peel accent.
  • Vinomane commented:

    10/23/14, 5:42 PM - Don't be surprised that Gran Reserva Riojas in the traditional style are youthful after many decades with very little sediment. That's just typicity -- no faking, no special cellaring. These wines mature for many years in old oak before bottling, dropping sediment in the process. Their slow oxygenation in youth produces near-immortality after bottling. Your experience is not unusual, but the norm. Only question is whether you like the style or don't.

Red
1982 Bodegas Riojanas Rioja Monte Real Reserva Tempranillo
1/25/2013 - drwine2001 wrote:
Five Decades of Bodegas Riojanas Monte Real (Piperade Restaurant, San Francisco): Disjointed nose-green, stalky, some VA. Light weight, fairly one dimensional, and that dimension is mostly wood. This did improve and begin to show a little fruit as it sat out, but I still think this is dried out and beyond a point of much pleasure.
  • Vinomane commented:

    2/9/14, 7:08 AM - You and Richard J. must have sat at different tables. Bottle variation!

Red
2004 C.V.N.E. (Compañía Vinícola del Norte de España) Rioja Imperial Gran Reserva Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo
11/27/2013 - BinVA wrote:
87 points
number 1 WS, 2013. I don't get it, not even a little bit. Let me update my prior note; I like Rioja, really enjoy tempranillo. Maybe I'm early on this bottle, but it tasted of a wine already into its aging period and was initially very tannic. Some of the tannin blew off and what was left was a medium wine, red berries somewhat muted by the oak and IMHO, an 87 point wine today. It was good, but on the rating scale, it was easily "Very Good", but not in the "Excellent" range. That said, I don't get the #1 rating. Maybe you do, but I don't.
  • Vinomane commented:

    1/3/14, 11:15 AM - You have committed infanticide. Wait ten years before tasting again and it will blow your socks off. Wait another ten after that and you will understand the rating.

Red
2001 La Rioja Alta Rioja Viña Ardanza Reserva Especial Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo
8/1/2013 - Vinomane Does not like this wine:
84 points
Yet another disappointing bottle of this overproduced, overhyped mediocrity. This example was stinky, full of VA with no compensating merit. Next time, somebody kick me before I buy in quantity without first tasting.
  • Vinomane commented:

    8/3/13, 8:24 AM - It's time for "Harley" to put up or shut up. "Fake?" Does this mean some of us have been drinking counterfeit '01 Ardanza GRE? If so, when did this problem become known? Has "Harley" discussed the matter with his friends at LRA? Or is "fake" simply a disembodied pejorative, tossed out to mean nothing in particular? "Overproduction," says "Harley" is an "excuse." Whose excuse? Is it an excuse for selling bad wine, or for drinking it? How many purchased grapes did LRA include in the '01 blend? From vines of what age? How much pruning was done? Why is every wine shop on the planet drowning in the stuff? Or did LRA simply seize the opportunity of a highly touted vintage, serving the genuine wine to visiting critics while flooding the market with the dross? I don't know the answer, but neither, apparently, does "Harley," who gives us all bluster and no substance.

  • Vinomane commented:

    8/3/13, 9:58 AM - For your information, Harley, I have visited and tasted at all the grand traditional bodegas of Haro and many in the Alavesa. Drunk through the wine list at Rekondo. Love traditional Rioja, which is why I own deep stocks from vintages 1947-2004. And I know all about the 2001 vintage, thank you very much. Every top Rioja from that year so far released is in my cellar, and the others, like the 890, will be added when available. So enough of your ho-hum generalities. Is there or isn't there counterfeit '01 Ardanza on the market? You don't tell us.
    Did LRA overcrop that vintage, at least for the Ardanza? Again, no information. When asked specific questions about your basis for using specific words, you respond with a gratuitous tour of your garage and a lecture on manners. Just as we've learned to expect from you: all feathers, no meat.

  • Vinomane commented:

    8/13/13, 7:43 PM - Well, JJ, let's see. "Overproduced" means, specifically, overcropped -- too much juice per hectare to maintain quality. True or false? You don't seem to know. "Overhyped" means, specifically, that its early press exceeds its performance in the glass. Would you, personally, really call this a 94-point wine, as professional critics did, having tasted Gran Riojas from top houses that couldn't reach that mark? I thought not. As for "mediocrity," just ask yourself where this '01 Ardanza stands among Riojas of its level you have ever tasted for QPR. In my experience, among hundreds of midrange reservas, it's mediocre -- drinkable, but nothing special. "94" means memorable. Finally, as for denigrating traditional Riojas, do you even bother reading? As written above, I own and treasure hundreds of traditional Riojas. It's simply that this particular one does not meet expectations, and this is noteworthy, given its gushing praise. Oh, and my stuff came not from one source, but three different ones at different times, so it's not a matter of buying a bad lot. Period.

1 - 13 of 13
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close