Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(7)

  1. Sizeola

    Sizeola

    1,661 Tasting Notes

  2. Burgnick

    Burgnick

    6,543 Tasting Notes

  3. Ms. Bubblehead

    Ms. Bubblehead

    887 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Community users think this wine goes best with:

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (48) Avg Score: 94.1 points

  • Frim magnum. Beautiful spice. Mature red fruit. Preferred this format to recent 750s.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • This is very stemmy on the nose. In fact it’s generally just very stemmy. It’s otherwise extremely elegant, perfumed and balanced with a lovely sweet core of very pure fruit. It’s actually a seriously gorgeous wine behind the stems.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Sexy, perfumed, feminine and penetrating. This is Dujac CSD at its best in this era. Compare to the 96 CDLR side by side, it is more sensual and alluring. So good. 95-96

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Saturday dinner ft. 1996 Dujac (Chicago, IL): Decanted for 2-3 hours before service. Served next to the CdlR and the differences between the two wines was stark. To be sure, these two bottles are from different sources, but this bottle was much more up my alley tonight (and in the few instances where I've had the two flagship Dujac wines side by side, I think I've preferred the CSD). For tonight's flight, while the CdlR seemed fully mature and at peak, the CSD was much more intense and burlier, and seemed to have a darker complexion. The tannic structure here was more pronounced and I think this still has a long way to go. The Dujac spice was more obvious on the CdlR though, I think because the wine was just overall a little lighter. Thrilling.

    As a bit of a post-script, I re-read Jeremy Seysses's comments in Jasper Morris's Inside Burgundy 2nd Edition regarding the differences between CSD and CdlR, and I would be in broad agreement with what he said, the only difference being that in this case I found the CdlR's tannins to be the silkier of the two and the CdlR the more readily approachable wine.

    2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Tanzer & Meadows were overly negative on this wine, but Gilman and Martin were overly positive. There is more here at the start versus the 1996 Dujac CDLR, which was served alongside it. Bright acidity on the nose, and that acidity negatively affects the fruit, much as with the the CDLR. With time in the glass it loses its vibrancy.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 48 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Neal Martin
    Domaine Dujac Clos Saint-Denis 1970-2004 (Mar 2020), 3/1/2020, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Domaine Dujac Clos Saint-denis Grand Cru Red) Login and sign up and see review text.

View From the Cellar

Burghound

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    March/April 1998, IWC Issue #77, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Domaine Dujac Clos St. Denis) Login and sign up and see review text.

Burghound

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and View From the Cellar and Burghound.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×