Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(70)

  1. smveluv

    smveluv

    9 Tasting Notes

  2. NickA

    NickA

    3,770 Tasting Notes

  3. earlemf

    earlemf

    31 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Community users think this wine goes best with:

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (143) Avg Score: 93.0 points

  • This wine has really started to come together since the last one I consumed a few years ago. It now shows a more pronounced nose of dark fruit, licorice, garrigue, and minerals leading to a full-bodied dark-fruited palate with an intense balsamic note through the mid-palate and a long finish. Still some tannins on the back-end but the fruit is there to outlast them. This should score better in a few years when all the pieces fully come together. Next bottle in 2 years. Great wine and even better with food.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Deep brick color verging on amber at the rim. Still, a fine black cherry core. The nose reveals a clearly aged wine where notes of prunes, raisins and tobacco are the main ingredients. A slightly alcoholic tone shines thorugh as well. Not much primary fruit left on the nose, athough one could- if forced to - to say something like black cherry and blackberries. Full bodied, rounded attack on the palate, fine acidity up front before a tobacco and prune-dominated mid-palate takes over. The mouthfeel is silky, with very fine tannins while upholding good grip, and a fine acidity to balance the rather heavy tobacco and dried fruit sweetness. The aftertaste continues in the same way as the mid-palate, but the acidity provides fine freshness that defies the quite evolved age. Some alcohol shines through on the finish, but not overtly so. A very fine, although not very elegant, wine that has aged surprisingly well. Drink now, or wait some more years if you want even less fruit and more tertiary tones.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Double decanted around 3pm for service around 630pm, at which point it was drunk over the course of 2-3 hours.

    This bottle was significantly better than my last bottle. On open tannins and acid were evident as with the last bottle, but there remained ample dark fruit and earthy tones to balance the structure of the wine (this was not the case last time, and as a result the wine came off as being much more "dried out"). The overall result was a wine that presented itself as less austere than I'd expected.

    Over the course of the evening the wine continued to improve, the fruit flavours became more lush, and the earthy tones came forward to round out what I felt was a very classically tasting Brunello. We drank this next to an '01 Percarlo which provided really nice contrast -- this had a noticeably darker fruit profile and showed more earth both on the palate and nose as opposed to the brighter red fruited profile of the percarlo that seemed to be accented with secondary aromas from the oak treatment more than soil tones.

    Regardless, both bottles were excellent and paired very well with various cuts of steak, potato dauphinoise, and roast vegatables.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • This wine is evolving nicely since my last tasting in 2018. Notes of dark fruit - cassis, cherry, black raspberry with notes of cedar with hints of spice. Tannins have softened and are well integrated. Long finish.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Christmas 2023; 12/24/2023-12/26/2023 (Home): First, I must note that this bottle had the worst cork I've encountered - the combination of being incredibly dry and crumbly yet also glued to the inside of the bottle (I had to chisel parts of it off with a knife) defeated even the Durand, and despite employing a coffee filter I couldn't get rid of all the cork dust. That may have prejudiced me against the wine itself, which provided pleasant drinking full of leathery cherry flavour, but was ultimately much more pruney and foursquare than I'd hoped. Hmm.

    3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

View all 143 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Decanter

View From the Cellar

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    July/August 2012, IWC Issue #163, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Il Poggione Brunello di Montalcino Riserva Vigna I Paganelli) Login and sign up and see review text.

i-WineReview.com

Vinous

  • By Antonio Galloni
    Brunello di Montalcino 2007: A Worthy Successor to 2006 (Apr 2012), (See more on Vinous...)

    (Il Poggione Brunello Di Montalcino Riserva Vigna Paganelli) Login and sign up and see review text.

JancisRobinson.com

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    2/9/2012, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 92 points

    (Il Poggione (Proprietá Franceschi) Brunello di Montalcino Riserva Vigna Paganelli) Ruby color; dried berry, tart cherry nose; tart berry, oak, cherry palate; needs 4 years; medium-plus finish

NOTE: Some content is property of Decanter and View From the Cellar and Vinous and i-WineReview.com and JancisRobinson.com and RJonWine.com.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×