Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(4)

  1. glou.sf

    glou.sf

    3,693 Tasting Notes

  2. Beerzebub

    Beerzebub

    1,765 Tasting Notes

  3. Svengali_Luddite

    Svengali_Luddite

    116 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (11) Avg Score: 86.9 points

  • Tasted blind. Lovely, savory nose of tart fruit, berries, and pepper. Good acidity with red berries and savory notes on the palate. Nice finish. This could easily be mistaken for a nice Northern Rhone, lovely wine!

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • P&p. Earthy, piney/herbaceous, cherry, clove and black pepper aromas, with some mild Brett in there melding with the general pungency. With air the fruit goes from reddish to darker; flowers and fleeting orange peel develop; and the light Brett seems to partially blow off. On the palate, crunchy, cool cherry/cranberry/hibiscus, stony earthiness, herbs/leaves. Light+ bodied, with some tannic grip. Good acidity. Slightly bitter finish, refreshing. Rustic, characterful, enjoyable; at its best with 90+ minutes of air in the bottle.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Classic Savoie red, with a bit of rusticity but plenty of ripeness and structure for the appellation/variety. Although I can perhaps see the Syrah comparisons, this reminded me more of something up the road, a Chalonnaise, maybe. Drinking pretty well now, my guess is this will improve. I only wish I were drinking this near the winery, overlooking Lac du Bourget!

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Decanted and tasted immediately. Smells good - fresh cherry, black pepper, light pine/herbs; the fruit is a touch candied, not in a bad way. Terrific tart acidity on the palate. Bright fresh fruit/hibiscus, with stony/mineral/earthy, peppery and piney/herbaceous accents. Lovely floral notes develop with a little air. Stony finish. Quite open and approachable (I'm doubtful that the decant was even called for), characterful, and tasty.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Good, but felt sweeter and more fruit forward than the 2008 version. At this point I prefer the 2008 : 86. Revisited the day after, and it fleshed out and got back to the herbal with more structure. Nice :89.
    Should revisit after couple years only...

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

View all 11 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×