Single blind. More closed and stubborn than the wide-open Barbaresco side-by-side. Rich, dense, burly with firm and coarse sandpaper-like tannin. Seems like what you might think 2010 Barolo would taste like at this stage. Upside from here - bury this in the cellar.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Barbaresco vs. Barolo (Chicago, IL): Served single blind. Along with the Barbaresco, surprisingly mature for the vintage (in hindsight). This felt a little lighter than the Maria di Brun. Additionally, it was a little more wound up, and showed more acid and seemingly a bit more long-term aging potential. A distinctly grainy and pronounced tannic structure made me think this was the Barolo of the flight.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Opened 10:00 pm day before for a slow ox. At 3:00 pm next day good nose but still tight. Decanted. At 5:00 tried again. Lost the nose. By 8:00 much better, finally unwinding with cherry cola, some tar and sous bois. Still dry tannins on the finish.
Not recommended to buy, but if you have it suggest to hold for another 5+ years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
10/13/2023 - Nanda wrote:
Single blind. More closed and stubborn than the wide-open Barbaresco side-by-side. Rich, dense, burly with firm and coarse sandpaper-like tannin. Seems like what you might think 2010 Barolo would taste like at this stage. Upside from here - bury this in the cellar.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/13/2023 - acyso wrote: 93 Points
Barbaresco vs. Barolo (Chicago, IL): Served single blind. Along with the Barbaresco, surprisingly mature for the vintage (in hindsight). This felt a little lighter than the Maria di Brun. Additionally, it was a little more wound up, and showed more acid and seemingly a bit more long-term aging potential. A distinctly grainy and pronounced tannic structure made me think this was the Barolo of the flight.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/27/2020 - Palisades57 wrote: 88 Points
Opened 10:00 pm day before for a slow ox. At 3:00 pm next day good nose but still tight. Decanted. At 5:00 tried again. Lost the nose. By 8:00 much better, finally unwinding with cherry cola, some tar and sous bois. Still dry tannins on the finish.
Not recommended to buy, but if you have it suggest to hold for another 5+ years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment