2016 BOND St. Eden

Community Tasting Notes (8) Avg Score: 96.7 points

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View KPB's profile
  • Report Issue

  11/9/2023 - KPB Likes this wine: 97 Points

  I last tried this in 2016 as a barrel sample yet, 7 years later, it remains remarkably unchanged.
  
  A lovely, seductive wine, the St Eden is very drinkable today. Deeply colored with a restrained nose showcasing ripe cassis fruit, inflected by hints of menthol and garrigue. Rich, soft palate is very long and finishes on a sweet note. Just wonderful!

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View csimm's profile
  • Report Issue

  6/1/2023 - csimm wrote: 97 Points

  2016 Napa Cults Blind - and a few Champs and such for fun: Deep and rich, but with a black fruited and mineral cut that starts out angular but quickly moves into a nice combination of grippy and giving. This is an interesting wine in that it starts out complex and gravitating, but actually moves to shutting down quickly as air permeates through its veins. It was one of my favorites at first, but then flatlines a bit and becomes drying on the finish. The back end screamed Bond, but the front end (especially in the beginning) had me thinking something in the Colgin Tychson arena. When revealed as Bond, it wasn’t a surprise, but I was initially impressed so much by the mid-palate here that I figured we were in a land that was a bit more on the opulent side. Overall, the classy concentration and persistence here is pretty impressive.

  1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Cristal2000's profile
  • Report Issue

  5/17/2023 - Cristal2000 Likes this wine:

  This was a 2016 vintage blind of: Abreu Thorevilos, Colgin IX, MacDonald, Scarecrow, Bond St. Eden, Eisele, Futo Oakville, Colgin Tychson and Vice Versa M7. Each wine had a decant of approximately five hours before the first sip, except for MacDonald, which had around three, and the Futo, which I believe was PnP. There were nine tasters, including CSIMM1161, wine proprietors and a prominent winemaker.
  
  I’d really love to post notes on all these wines, but unfortunately time is scarce, and I don’t think I would be able to get to it anytime soon. I am sure CSIMM will post a ton on each, so that should fill the gap. Instead, I am going to give the broad strokes here.
  
  The first thing to note is all these wines could have used more air, especially the MacDonald. We shorted it in the tasting, and I think there was an impact on how it showed. The other thing that could have impacted how the wines showed is bottle shock. Most of these bottles were packed onto an airplane a couple days prior. While I didn’t note any overtly off bottles, there is no doubt it could have played a role.
  
  I know a lot of folks that hate blinds. It can really test your palate, and crowing a winner means the other great bottles must “lose”. If you haven’t done it before, it can also wear you down and things can blend, so it does take a methodology and consistency to do it well. That said, all these wines were spectacular.
  
  While we didn’t have the group rank order them all, we did ask for a top 3. The consensus was 1. Magnificent 7 2. Futo and 3. Scarecrow. There were certainly others than received votes in the top 3, but overall, it was uniform across the group. Those top three were easily 99-100 pt wines, and the others were not far behind. A few comments on each (in no particular order outside the top 3):
  
  1. Magnificent 7: almost universally the #1 wine in the tasting, this had all the elements of perfection. Suave and powerful, with super refined tannins, excellent purity, unreal depth, and a finish for days. Nothing harsh and pure class without any element out of balance.
  
  2. Futo: super focused wine with precision, this wrapped power and grace into a regal package. Showed dark chocolate and powerful fruit intensity backed up by impressive levels of freshness and acidity. Simply outstanding.
  
  3. Scarecrow: the most opulent, plush, and sexy wine of the bunch. While some of the other wines were trying to get all the pieces to fit together, this one was complete on every level. Beautifully integrated with supple tannins and wonderful energy and balance.
  
  4. Colgin IX: the only mountain/hillside wine of the bunch. This wine really progressed over the course of the tasting to the point where it was gaining on the leaders. Lovely red soil profile with deep mineral driven flavors, the mid palate began expanding over time and produced a complex, powerful yet refined wine with fantastic length.
  
  5. MacDonald: this was one of the wines that was a bit discombobulated, and I attribute that mostly to lack of decant time. It showed more spice and woodsy character than usual and was a little rough around the edges despite clearly having the class, pedigree, and overall intensity to be amongst the best wines in Napa.
  
  6. Colgin Tychson: this had a soft, supple entry with opulent fruit and gorgeous floral notes. The mid palate stayed tight throughout, and it never really blossomed into what I am sure will be an epic wine. I love this bottling, and this is going to be spectacular with a bit more time.
  
  7. Eisele: another wine here that needed more time to unfurl. This showed possibly the best complexity of the bunch, both on the nose and in the glass. It had all the hallmark savory character, but the fruit was wound up tight and there was a bit of oak obscuring things. I’ve had this when its blown my mind, just needs more air or more time.
  
  8. Abreu Thorevilos: the most disappointing wine for me in this tasting. I was expecting it to vie for top honors and it couldn’t get out of its own way. It was super unresolved and reductive, with oak and tannin obscuring most everything. This is a fabulous vineyard and winemaker, so I am sure it will come around, and part of me wants to attribute this showing to bottle shock.
  
  9. Bond St Eden: another wine that was within striking distance of the leaders. Rich, textured, beautiful and still grippy, it showed a ton of class with hallmark red earth notes and killer concentration and length.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View msuwine's profile
  • Report Issue

  2/28/2022 - msuwine wrote: 95 Points

  This rich and layered Cabernet is more generous than complex at the moment, but it is delicious nonetheless. Dark red in color and full in body, the wine offers aromas of blackberry, mocha, graphite, and mulberry. Flavors of blueberry, milk chocolate, coffee beans, and leather, with a soft and grainy finish. 14.8% alcohol. Decant three hours if drinking now, but this should be better in 2025 or later.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View MC2 Wines's profile
  • Report Issue

  10/21/2021 - MC2 Wines Likes this wine:

  Wine Spectator 40th Anniversary; 10/21/2021-10/23/2021 (Marriott Marquis): Another one of the wines that jumped out for me. Really enjoy this vineyard and just thought this was very well done in a more balanced style.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 8 Community Tasting Notes

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.