Clearly over the hill. Brick red edges. Still very jammy. Very ripe dried fruit notes. However, it has Bret. I am not very sensitive to Bret, but my sister is and she refused to drink any. I think it is no longer a very good wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Dried fruit, prune, and raisin nose. The palate was more of the same cooked notes, mushy cherries chocolate, sherry like at times. Decent finish. Overall showed strong signs of heat exposure, too bad.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
This bottling was recommended to me by a Burgundy aficionado who opined that even though it's a big, broad-shouldered wine it has a Richebourg-esque harnessed power. Unfortunately, the few I've tried younger than this had the power but were just fat and unrefined. But now with this wine I see what he is talking about. Maybe age has streamlined it into the right proportions. This is intensely aromatic with mature savory scents from the moment the cork pops and the bouquet fills the room as it's decanted. The fruit retains a vibrancy and freshness that makes it taste much younger but has coalesced into an exotic melange much deeper than anything you can find in a young wine, enlivened by the aromatics and flavor of steeped orange peel. Very classy and drinkable, this is really on the verge of true grand cru.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Drank a bottle of this and a bottle of the 1996 Rincon PN last night with some friends. Both superb Pinots. Very different from each other. The Rincon was very structured with defined fruit tastes, mostly cherry but some florals running around also. Not alot of nose at first but after it had been open half an hour the nose got better and better. This is a wine that will get better for some years yet.
The Rosemary's Vineyard on the other hand was a fruit bomb. Incredible fruit package. An immense pleasure to drink, but I am not sure if it will ever get any better. No sign of age on it yet, but to my mind it lacks the structure to age and improve. Which is not to say it won't stay just fine for years to come. I don't know.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
10/29/2011 - AlanM5 wrote: 75 Points
Clearly over the hill. Brick red edges. Still very jammy. Very ripe dried fruit notes. However, it has Bret. I am not very sensitive to Bret, but my sister is and she refused to drink any. I think it is no longer a very good wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/30/2011 - SoCal wrote:
Dried fruit, prune, and raisin nose. The palate was more of the same cooked notes, mushy cherries chocolate, sherry like at times. Decent finish. Overall showed strong signs of heat exposure, too bad.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/24/2010 - Keith Levenberg wrote: flawed
Cooked and maderized.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/18/2008 - Keith Levenberg wrote: 91 Points
This bottling was recommended to me by a Burgundy aficionado who opined that even though it's a big, broad-shouldered wine it has a Richebourg-esque harnessed power. Unfortunately, the few I've tried younger than this had the power but were just fat and unrefined. But now with this wine I see what he is talking about. Maybe age has streamlined it into the right proportions. This is intensely aromatic with mature savory scents from the moment the cork pops and the bouquet fills the room as it's decanted. The fruit retains a vibrancy and freshness that makes it taste much younger but has coalesced into an exotic melange much deeper than anything you can find in a young wine, enlivened by the aromatics and flavor of steeped orange peel. Very classy and drinkable, this is really on the verge of true grand cru.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/8/2005 - AlanM5 wrote:
Drank a bottle of this and a bottle of the 1996 Rincon PN last night with some friends. Both superb Pinots. Very different from each other. The Rincon was very structured with defined fruit tastes, mostly cherry but some florals running around also. Not alot of nose at first but after it had been open half an hour the nose got better and better. This is a wine that will get better for some years yet.
The Rosemary's Vineyard on the other hand was a fruit bomb. Incredible fruit package. An immense pleasure to drink, but I am not sure if it will ever get any better. No sign of age on it yet, but to my mind it lacks the structure to age and improve. Which is not to say it won't stay just fine for years to come. I don't know.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment