This shows classic Sangiovese cherry and some dark fruit, with notes of leather and earth on the medium finish; light tannins and moderate acidity. This is simple and light for a Brunello, and it's not worth holding any longer. It was an average to below average value at a little under $40.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Losing some structure now and probably wasn't a good choice to follow a 2006 Ravello Barolo which was much more structured and tannic. It was an interesting combo with our dinner but we should have had this wine first in retrospect. Still very enjoyable and very sofr.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
7/14/2019 - RichardP wrote: 88 Points
This shows classic Sangiovese cherry and some dark fruit, with notes of leather and earth on the medium finish; light tannins and moderate acidity. This is simple and light for a Brunello, and it's not worth holding any longer. It was an average to below average value at a little under $40.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/10/2014 - bobvictor Likes this wine: 89 Points
Perfectly pleasant brunello -- qpr. Not memorable
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/20/2014 - WineGuyDelMar Likes this wine: 89 Points
Losing some structure now and probably wasn't a good choice to follow a 2006 Ravello Barolo which was much more structured and tannic. It was an interesting combo with our dinner but we should have had this wine first in retrospect. Still very enjoyable and very sofr.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/1/2013 - Doblk wrote: 88 Points
Much like previous bottle. Not bad but I didn't find it very interesting.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/9/2013 - dankrems wrote: 90 Points
Lots of dark fruit and some leather. Ok. Might have been better with a bit more age, but probably not. Not enough complexity.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment