Monterrey, Mexico
Tasted Tuesday, September 25, 2007 by hcampana with 2,330 views
My tasting group meets roughly once per month. This time, we decided to change the format so each member would organize a themed tasting that could be more educational than what we had been doing until now. I chose my last few bottles of several Don Melchor vintages in order to give my friends a glimpse on how these wines age. In my past experience the answer to this question was "very well".
We met at the best restaurant in Monterrey: Pangea, where cheff and group member Guillermo Gonzalez prepared a wonderful tasting menu. Wines were served in individual Riedel glassware that allowed us to compare and revist all wines.
We actually started with a Mexican white wine whose name and vintage I failed to write down. The first dish was very refreshing. Brick of watermelon core over a bed of fetta cheese, pistachios, real bacon bits and fried basil mixed with bee honey.
Tower of broiled black cod over a slice of pan fried egg plant, sauteed potatoes and piquillo pepper over a mirror of white truffle sauce.
Medium cooked pork loin medallions over a Tlacoyo (mexican corn pastry) filled with black beans and hoja santa which sat over a ragout of zucchini flower and portobello mushrooms which in turn, was centered on two concentric circles of: mole sauce spiced with cinammon and an outer ring of juicy pineapple compote. This was absolutely spectacular with a sorgasborg of flavors meshing togther and liveining the dish.
Lime trio dessert. This was also exquisite, but I should have brought a Loire or an Alsace SGN to go with it.
This was a very puzzling tasting. None of the wines showed the Chilean aromatic typicity of wet loam and eucalyptus. Instead, most of them smelled like ultra ripe Aussie cabs. Full of melted butter and lactic aromas. Furthermore, the 1995 had morphed into a Rhone look alike that I had never experienced. Finally, even when I have always loved Don Melchor, to me, there is no question Almaviva is a better wine in almost all vintages.
1995 Concha y Toro Cabernet Sauvignon Don Melchor 92 Points
Chile, Maipo Valley, Puente Alto
Dark ruby with bricking at the rim. This is a weird nose for a Don Melchor, and very different from any other Chilean Cab I have ever had. Packed with diversity, this nose seems a bit oxidized at first. It later gives way to minerality, caramel, bacon, spices and a salty note. Is this really Chilean? It smells like a ripe year Chateauneuf du Pape! Medium bodied, with a very complex finish of mushrooms in brine. This is drinking very well, time has served it well. I am completely surprised by this wine. Last time I had (about 3 years ago) it also showed minerality, but none of this provenzal smorgarsboard of charcuterie. This is the best among the 4 aged Don Melchors (1995-2000) we had tonight.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
1996 Concha y Toro Cabernet Sauvignon Don Melchor 90 Points
Chile, Maipo Valley, Puente Alto
Slightly darker ruby (vs. the 1995) with bricking in the rim. Also showing minerality and dark fruits in the nose, but lacking the unusual bacon and spiced meat shown by its younger sibling. Instead it shows a hint of funkiness with swirling. In the mouth, this is less intensely flavored vs, the 1997, medium bodied, with the highest acidity of all wines tasted tonight. Those with an Euro centric palate will like it.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
1997 Concha y Toro Cabernet Sauvignon Don Melchor 87 Points
Chile, Maipo Valley, Puente Alto
This wine was a dissapointment given its very good track record in previous tastings. Medium to dark ruby with substantial bricking. Raw meat, minerals and subdued dark fruit jam. This is surprisingly light for this hot vintage. Lacking afruit in the mid palate and depth in the flavor profile. Bad bottle?
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue