Search Results - Save This Search

Wine Type Vintage Name Variety Locale Date Posted Score Helpful Comments Comment Date Community Score More...
White - Sparkling

NV Pol Roger Champagne Brut Réserve

Champagne Blend more

8/9/2023 - forceberry wrote: 84 points

A blend of Chardonnay, Pinot Meunier and Pinot Noir in equal proportions. 12,5% alcohol, dosage 9 g/l and 6 g/l acidity. No disgorgement date, but the wine is a recent purchase, so probably based on relatively recent vintages. Tasted blind.

Pale, rather neutral whitish-green color. The nose feels youthful and fruity with relatively primary aromas of white fruits, some grapefruit, light sweet notes of ripe pear and a faint yet distinctive hint of caraway seeds. The wine feels ripe, youthful and quite fruity on the palate with flavors of ripe pear and pear skin, some yeasty tones, a little bit of fresh Granny Smith apple, light sweet notes of juicy white peach and a hint of grapefruit marmalade. The dosage shows a bit, accentuating the sweeter tones to some degree. A rich, ample and creamy mousse and a high acidity. The finish is ripe and sweet-toned with flavors of juicy red apple, some leesy notes of yeast, a little bit of steely minerality, light rubbery nuances of reduction, a hint of ripe citrus fruits and a touch of pear.

A harmless, fruity and slightly sweet-toned entry-level Champagne. There was quite a bit of discussion whether this was a serious, structured Prosecco or a disappointing Champagne. We finally went for Champagne, due to the combination of high acidity and somewhat leesy autolytic tones suggesting méthode traditionnelle wine - even if the primary fruit notes reminiscent of pear did remind me of Prosecco. Well, turned out to be the basic Pol Roger bottling. I guess this has been the most disappointing bottle I've tasted of this label yet. This is a rip-off at 59€.

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    2/11/2024 7:34:00 AM - Hi Forceberry, I don't normally comment on champagne but I think perhaps you had a faulty bottle? Pol is one of our favourite NVs and we must have had hundreds of bottles over the years with few disappointments, but on New Years Eve I opened a bottle with what I can only assume was excessive reduction - all the "symptoms" you mentioned. I thought at the time that double-decanting would perhaps improve the wine somewhat, but this wasn't really an option with other things going on that night, so we opened a Moet 2012 to replace it which delivered very nicely. We have had a few disappointments with Pol over the years but not very many (3 or 4 in several hundred), this was purchased about three years ago in a French supermarket, no idea of disgorgement date (in a box so it wasn't bottle-shock), a bottle opened last weekend however did deliver the required Pol experience. I wouldn't give up on Pol just yet!

Red

1986 Château Léoville Barton

St. Julien Red Bordeaux Blend more

2/1/2022 - nskelsey wrote: 90 points

I opened this up to celebrate the life of the great Anthony Barton who sadly died a couple of weeks ago. Leoville Barton has always been a classic, 'old school' claret that I've regularly bought for 50 years although along with other Chateaux has begun to change over the last few years in making slightly more approachable wines for drinking at a younger age. 'Old style' consists of tannin, long maturing and notes of tobacco, leather, cedar (pencils) and so on, whereas 'new style is a little bit more fruit driven and ready for consuming earlier. Due to past experience I gave this 8 hours in a decanter, but with hindsight maybe it should have had 8 days. My God the '86 is 'Old School'. I bought this wine when I was 33...and I'm now 68 and the bloody thing still isn't ready; I'm going to be dead soon! Now in its 36th year the first impression is the dry layer of tannin that thickly coats your palate. Fortunately there is still the fruit to give you hope that it can sort itself out, but it is barely in the drinking window. Every 2-3 years I consume a bottle and every 2-3 years it has barely budged. When I'm 71 I'll let you know what the next one is like, but don't hold your breath. So far I am 8 bottles down and still not a lot to show for it. Back in the mists of time Parker said this wine was a monolith that could possibly last 50 years. He was wrong; at this rate it still won't be ready to start drinking until it's at least 50! Mr Barton you are a legend and every time I open up one of your wines I will be celebrating a life well lived in bringing so much pleasure to me. On a bright note the 1990 is drinking very nicely. Happy days!

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    2/2/2022 12:09:00 PM - tee hee!...this made me laugh, I'm 71 going on 72 and also have four bottles left from a case bought en primeur in 1987. What a tannic beast, only one of the eight bottles we consumed over the past 35 years has been anything like ready and I put this down as a fluke. Luckily my son-in-law was born in 1986 so I'm giving him the remaining four bottles in advance for his 70th birthday. Happy days indeed!

Red

2009 Château Belgrave

Haut-Médoc Red Bordeaux Blend more

2/7/2021 - auldalliance wrote: NR

Decanted 2-3 hours before dinner but the fruit was still shimmying shyly behind a curtain of tannin. A slightly offputting sourness to it at first, but mellowed a bit. I think this wine still needs some time, despite 11 years of age. The colour was still deep crimson with no sign of browning. It was a good foil for the rich sweet lamb (more like hogget, and all the better for it), and the last half glass showed promising signs. Half of this bottle left - will be interesting to see if it mellows further or closes up.

EDIT: Pleased to say it mellowed on night 2, some nice sweet fruit showing but still a bit in the background. Sour note had become more mineral like too, so a better drink after a full 30 hours decanted!

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    2/8/2021 1:09:00 AM - I agree with you, I think it needs a few more years. We opened one recently and came to the same conclusion, which contrasts with my opinion of a few years back. I think maybe like a lot of Medocs that middle-aged Belgrave doesn't show very well!

Red

2015 Clos du Jaugueyron Haut-Médoc

Red Bordeaux Blend more

8/25/2019 - Keith Levenberg Likes this wine: 92 points

Actually a bit fruitier than my last bottle. Otherwise not hugely different in flavor but definitely in a better place in terms of integration and general satisfaction, because when I went to pour another sip to come up with something clever to say in a note, there wasn't any left.

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    8/26/2019 1:50:00 PM - Your first tasting note on this wine summed up my feelings exactly, Keith, it reminded me why I fell for Haut-Medoc wines in the first place. We visited Michel's place in May, his passion for what he does and how he does it is infectious. The 2015 Margaux is definitely worth a taste IMO, a step up in class, though my understanding moving forwards is that there won't be any 2018 Margaux from him, mildew wasn't kind in this area to anyone with his uncompromising dedication to "bio"..

Red

2004 R. López de Heredia Rioja Reserva Viña Tondonia

Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo more

5/19/2019 - Pluecht wrote: 88 points

Past its prime

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    5/20/2019 4:46:00 AM - What they said....LdH don't normally release these until they are more than a decade old so "past its prime" just doesn't make sense! Maybe a faulty bottle? I tasted one of mine mid-2018 and figured it needed at least another 4 years or so, but there is certainly bottle variation with this producer..

Red

1986 Château Léoville Barton

St. Julien Red Bordeaux Blend more

12/9/2018 - Eudemis Likes this wine: NR

12% alcohol. The level is good, at bottom of the neck. The cork is soaked through, and it breaks up two thirds of the way upon extraction; no problem getting the other third out by the usual technique of tackling it at an angle. No idea why people are spending good money on specialist corkscrews. Decanted a short 30mn ahead in view of the venerable age of the bottle.
The colour is dark, slightly dull, with some thinning at the edge of the rim but no significant browning. The nose is not very intense but it has a surprisingly vivid feel; no fruit left as such, but very pleasant with a suggestion of caramel. The mouth has good energy, with nothing faded about it; fine acidity and good length, albeit in a slightly fluid way.
I won't hide the fact that I am quite disappointed by this bottle; yes it has held through 32 years, and yes it is in good condition, but is it better now than it was 15 years ago ? I can't say for sure as this is a once-off for me in this vintage, a gift from a now deceased friend and mentor (RIP JTL), but I suspect that I would have liked it better then. The problem for me is that the flavours that I get are not sufficiently refined or even distinctive to compensate for the loss of fruit. Certainly no magic here.

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    12/11/2018 12:57:00 AM - Eudemis, I don't think you'd have found this better 15 years ago. I bought a case (12) of these on release back when I still had hair, it has been a super-tannic beast which didn't really give up anything for 25 years or so, and which has been all but undrinkable, at least to me.

    Having said that, the bottle I last opened a couple of years ago seemed just about in the window and was drinking very well, a solid if not stellar performance, so I look forward to better things from my remaining bottles some time in the next few years. L-B always needs time, but the '86s were hard as nails and quite unpleasant for a long time. Maybe your bottle was unrepresentative though?

Red

1988 Château Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande

Pauillac Red Bordeaux Blend more

3/1/1997 - sdr Does not like this wine: 84 points

Hollywood Wine Seminar. Medium color. Hard oaky spicy nose. More cool and classic than the ‘89. Firm and tannic. Doesn’t have enough fruit for the structure.
Clive Coates: “high acidity at first, elegant, lush and complex, super”

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    9/25/2018 3:53:00 AM - The fruit went away a few years back...some might see this as an advantage, depending on how you like your claret..though I would agree it has seen better days.

Red

1990 Vieux Château Certan

Pomerol Red Bordeaux Blend more

1/4/2016 - kevin h wrote: 88 points

Thin, dumb and a bit lifeless at first. A three hour decant brought out some character but still a nonedescript nose. Better flavour, polished fed fruits and some dry tannins. Not much to like here, rather disappointing as it was for a special occasion.

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    1/4/2016 2:22:00 AM - Hi..I've had a very similar experience with the case I bought e.p. from TWS. The first few were great in their youth and promised much but recently very disappointing. I really don't know whether to drink or hold on my remaining bottles..

Red

2001 R. López de Heredia Rioja Reserva Viña Tondonia

Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo more

3/10/2015 - EhrlichDY Likes this wine: 91 points

A 2003 Bosconia Riserva that showed well piqued my interest and I decided to try one of these. i found this wine to be more feminine and based on finesse. It's aged dusty quality was less prominent than the Bosconia. In fact, everything was playing at a lower volume in this wine. Perhaps the wine is in a shy phase or it's just how it is. Tannins are well integrated and this has entered its drinking plateau.

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    3/10/2015 7:28:00 AM - I think these are in a fairly dumb phase right now and might repay keeping another few years, which is what I intend to do..

Red

2001 R. López de Heredia Rioja Reserva Viña Tondonia

Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo more

10/29/2014 - Drankard wrote: 90 points

This light, balanced red delivers mature flavors of dried cherry, medicinal cherry, and leather. Fresh and lively boosted by zesty minerality. Classic Rioja but a bit uninteresting. I would drink up.

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    10/30/2014 12:22:00 AM - I think these might be shutting down temporarily - I'm going to leave my remaining bottles another few years. There's some bottle variation, too..

Red

2010 E. Guigal Côtes du Rhône

Red Rhone Blend more

5/1/2014 - monahanchris wrote: NR

Bottle variation worked out for me on this one. I generally like this CdR as a value proposition, but have found the 2010 to be a little thin and out of balance. This appeared medium/dark with a nose of raspberry and pepper. Good amount of fruit on the palate and medium to long finish with well resolved tannin and decent acidity. It showed really well.

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    5/1/2014 8:44:00 AM - I agree, Chris...maybe it'll settle down with a couple more years on it?

Red

2009 Abbaye de Lérins Mediterranée Vieilles Syrah Saint Sauveur

more

11/27/2013 - Vintomas wrote: 91 points

Abbaye de Lérins wines tasted from WIT glass tubes (Stockholm): Dark red colour, rather deep hue. Deep and powerful nose with ripe dark cherries, some liquorice, some tar and smoke, a hint of animal notes and toasted oak with some vanilla and brown butter. Full-bodied, palate with very dark cherries and blackberries, powerful concentration of fruit, rather good acidity, medium+ tannins that show some polished style, aftertaste with rather tart berries and a lot of tannin. Young, 91(+) p.
Definitely a serious wine! The slightly peculiar oak barrel note (I assume that's the origin of the vanilla and brown butter aromas) is the same as in the 2009 Saint Honorat, and the impression of brown butter really stuck once I had started to associate to that aroma. The palate actually reminded me rather much of a Hermitage (possibly laced with some Mourvèdre). Cellaring is definitely to recommend, but possibly this wine will mature faster than Syrah usually does. Given its concentration, I expect it to keep for a really long time, though.

  • Comment posted by johnnyrichardson:

    12/9/2013 9:49:00 AM - I have 1 bottle of this which I purchased while visiting the island (which I can see from our holiday home) for lunch - I had no idea at the time if it was a serious wine or an expensive tourist wine. Based on your note I will leave it for another few years, and probably buy some more next time I visit..thank you!

Loading wine details...
loading

×
×