| Wine Type | Vintage Name Variety Locale | Date Posted Score Helpful Comments More... |
|---|---|---|
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
7/15/2009 - WetRock wrote: NRPlastic cork. Barely any nose to speak of even after a couple days open. Straight, linear red wine that is richer than I expected. Couldn't identify it as Pinot but couldn't say it wasn't either. Shows some balancing acids but not strongly. It's just red wine. Is it a value for $3? Hard to say. I'm not buying anymore since there was nothing to make me want more. But there is certainly nothing flawed about this wine or that stands out as being a big negative either. |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
7/15/2009 - AustinJC wrote: NRI have to agree with everyone else. Little to no nose to speak of. A little red fruit and spice. The palate is of tart cherries and maybe a hint of fig, which is what I've come to expect from low end Pinot Noir. This wine is definitely not worth the $15 tag. There are amazing wines to be had at that price point and this fell very short. |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
7/1/2009 - jeffal66 wrote: 82 pointsNo notes. Very light, non offensive. Bought for $6 (I think) in PA. |
| Red |
2006 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
7/1/2009 - Snoman wrote: 68 pointsWell-made from unripe fruit. Nothing can save this wine from being green and tangy, with vegetal overlay. Absolutely requires food to consume. A steal at 2.99 from Trader Joe's......that is they stole the TJ buyer's money on this one. |
| Red |
2007 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Force Canyon Vineyard Arroyo Secomore |
6/28/2009 - rjonwine@gmail.com wrote: 84 points2009 Pinot Days Grand Tasting (Fort Mason Festival Pavillon, San Francisco, California): Big berry, carbonic maceration nose; black fruit, carbonic maceration, graphite palate; short-medium finish |
| Red |
2006 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Force Canyon Vineyard Arroyo Secomore |
5/13/2009 - Squeeze wrote: 84 pointsOkay low-end pinot, fruit was a little thin, acidity okay, but no complexity or length. At least it tasted like a Pinot (most sub-15 pinot don't). |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
5/12/2009 - wineaboutit wrote: 80 pointsHoping for something cool from a great '05 vintage. Drinkable, simply another mediocre pinot noir, join the club... |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
5/8/2009 - chmd wrote: 83 pointsI expected this $10 Pinot Noir to be swill, but was pleasantly surprised. Still, the problem with PN is that it's either great or mediocre. Even in that price range, there are tons of wines that are delicious and more fun to drink. |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
4/4/2009 - EaglesWin wrote: 85 pointsPass. |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
4/9/2009 - Rmcgeary wrote: 87 pointsSo so at best. Probably better second night with airation |
| Red |
2006 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Force Canyon Vineyard Arroyo Secomore |
3/6/2009 - Bob in NC wrote: 86 pointsCherry dominates the nose with subtle cedar notes. A nice blend of cherry, cedar, earth and vanilla tastes with a supple mouth feel and a medium short refined finish. A good smooth drinking QPR Pinot that is ready to drink now, don’t hold. |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
2/4/2009 - The Drunken Cyclist wrote: 82 pointsDrank over two nights. First night, not great. Thin, not very interesting. I would give more of a tasting note, but there was not much taste. The second day, there was a chill left from the over-night in the fridge. Today, it resembled an average Beaujolais, which is a good thing (at least better than yesterday). |
| Red |
2006 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
1/23/2009 - RobertDwyer wrote: 68 pointsWhat an awful wine. Watery, lacking flavor, extremely low alcohol and a non-existent finish. Amazingly, a bad value even at $6.99. What a disappointing French Pinot Noir. The problem I have with wines like this, is that somebody might be turned off to the varietal in general after experimenting with this one. Avoid like the plague at any price. |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Edna Valleymore |
10/5/2008 - Capt M wrote: 80 pointsNot too offensive but disjointed, relevant acidity, hollow in the middle, uninspiring, and with a little bit of fakeness. |
| White |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Chardonnay Edna Valleymore |
9/3/2008 - Capt M wrote: 85 pointsLight golden color. Very buttery on the nose. It is almost all you can sense on the nose, with very subtle lemongrass, tangerine nuances. This is a full bodied chardonnay with a respectable oak influence, or maybe a little bit too much. Fruit, oak, and acidity are a little bit all over the place; a little bit disjointed. Unfortunately, I'm not pairing this wine with a dish at the moment, but all in all, I bet it would come together fairly well. I did used it to boost a mushroom risotto that I'm cooking, and I bet that it gave it some good character. I suspect that the fruit that lies under that bed of oak is pretty good quality and enjoyable. |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
6/19/2008 - creining wrote: 80 pointsOpened up after airing, not very complex, good spice and berry on the nose, slightly acidic on the finish. |
| Red |
2003 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Santa Lucia Highlandsmore |
5/12/2008 - dionysis wrote: 81 pointsNot good and only borderline drinkable. I think this should have been consumed on purchase 3 years ago, as it is not aging well. |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
3/21/2008 - heathtor wrote: 50 pointsthin; sharp; some varietal nose; not worth $8 |
| Red |
2004 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Santa Maria Valleymore |
10/25/2007 - madmax7272 wrote: 95 pointsone of the best pinot noirs we have ever had!! |
| Red |
2005 Hangtime Cellars Pinot Noir Bourgognemore |
7/20/2007 - acchrist0 wrote: 82 pointsNot a huge fan of this wine, but I have to admit its the secod time I've thrown a bottle into a mixed case. Overall, a little watery and not much of a finish, but its drinkable and has a nice berry/acid balance. As long as you don't set your expectations too high you can't be too disappointed with a $13 wine. |
| White |
2002 Hangtime Cellars Chardonnay Californiamore |
7/12/2007 - vinoceros wrote: 86 pointsThe best bottle of them. Very distinct oak and apple. I think the inconsistency is due to their age (5 years). |
| White |
2002 Hangtime Cellars Chardonnay Californiamore |
7/4/2007 - vinoceros wrote: 82 pointsEvery one of these bottles has been different, probably due to their age (2002). This one was on it's way to a desert wine - it tasted like carmel syrup. |
| White |
2002 Hangtime Cellars Chardonnay Californiamore |
7/3/2007 - vinoceros wrote: 81 pointsWorst of the bunch so far. Funky taste on the finish. |
| White |
2002 Hangtime Cellars Chardonnay Californiamore |
6/26/2007 - vinoceros wrote: 85 pointsBetter than the last bottle. Should be drank closer to room temp. |
| White |
2002 Hangtime Cellars Chardonnay Californiamore |
4/24/2007 - vinoceros wrote: 83 pointsDrank this one over 2 nights. Slightly corky nose but didn't taste corked, pretty bland. Second night was better - cork nose was gone and there was a slight caramel flavor, but not much finish to speak of. Near the end of it's life, obviously. |
Search Results - Save This Search
- Tasting notes: 111 notes on 43 wines
