Josch48

Member #648,447 signed up 4/23/2019

This Member Is a Fan(3)

  1. oldwines

    oldwines

    5,133 Tasting Notes

  2. Rote Kappelle

    Rote Kappelle

    645 Tasting Notes

  3. Dad300

    Dad300

    328 Tasting Notes

Fans(7)

1 to 3 of 7

  1. Callum's Corkers

    Callum's Corkers

    1,188 Tasting Notes

  2. der Schmecker

    der Schmecker

    496 Tasting Notes

  3. oldwines

    oldwines

    5,133 Tasting Notes

More

Friends(3)

  1. RPHC

    RPHC

    150 Tasting Notes

  2. CCestaro

    CCestaro

    317 Tasting Notes

  3. srh

    srh

    7,379 Tasting Notes

Member since April 2019

This member's profile is not public.

  • 2016 Columbia Crest Cabernet Sauvignon Reserve Stonetree Vineyard - Clone 5

    Wahluke Slope more
    Options4/21/2024 - I LIKE THIS WINE: 94 points (Edit)
    I am curious if there are many people outside of the Pacific Northwest of the US who may be aware of the stellar and highly affordable (especially given the consistent high level of their products), Columbia Crest line of Reserve red wines.
    This (100% Cabernet Sauvignon) darkly opaque beauty has aromas of intensely concentrated blueberry and boysenberry compote, with a bouquet of faintly smokey, tight grained oak.
    The utterly voluptuous medium + viscosity mouthfeel conveys ultra extracted flavors of sweet blue/black fruits, supported by a slippery glycerin-like, yet bright acidity, soft tannins, and a deliciously silky (15% ABV) delivery of a comprehensive enjoyment of fruit redolent over the entire length of the palate, reminiscent of a more rounded version of the offerings of my favorite Alexander Valley Cabernet Sauvignon producers.
    Some may understandably draw extraction comparisons with a Ruby Port, or Amarone style of vinification, with no objections from me, but this still youthful wine’s varietal identity is assured.
    These Washington State wines, produced by Columbia Crest, are well deserving of sampling.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • 2011 Anakota Cabernet Sauvignon Helena Montana Vineyard

    Impenetrably dark blue/black hue with a slim crimson corona at the edge. Freshly opened, The nose is bouquet forward, showing Bordeaux evoking dried tobacco, graphite, cigar box, aged saddle leather, notes of cedar, and a brilliant central core of heady blackberry and blueberry, tightly wrapped in a sweet toasted oak smokiness.
    The medium body, silky mouthfeel shows sweet, yet slightly faded fruit flavors commensurate with the nose, immediately overtaken by an intrusive tannic presence that almost completely displaces the fruit from the mid palate, with the fruit returning timidly, on the finish.
    The visually inferred level of extraction is not readily appreciated on the palate past the initial first impressions, and is overtaken by the tight grained French (70% new) oak barrels. The Anakota website does not state whether the oak is tight grained Allier, that usually exhibits delicate flavors and smoother tannins, or Troncais, a more coarse grained oak, that can impart a more heightened oak influence to a wine.
    The fruit is supple, sweet, and elegant, but is regrettably overshadowed by demonstrably persistent tannins.
    This wine was a gracious gift, one my wine budget does not frequently allow, and the wines from this elevated Sonoma location, Northwest of Calistoga, is not one of familiarity.
    The wine exhibits a conundrum, one not readily solved with a snapshot tasting of one vintage, of three location offerings. I will, in all fairness, revisit this review after we enjoy the wine with dinner.
    With food, the tannins are tamed and ably support and transport the creamy and sophisticated flavors, in accord with an appropriate acidity. The wine reminds me of my favorite Alexander Valley Cabernet Sauvignon producers, but somehow a wormhole seems to have been opened from Southwest facing, 4,000 feet altitude Sonoma Valley, through to an area midway between Pauillac and Margaux, resulting in a wine wholly uncharacteristic of California.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • 2021 Pecchenino Dogliani San Luigi

    Heavily saturated black cherry color, with an aromatic nose of dusty red and black fruit, and a smoky bouquet of roasting beef and Italian herbs.
    Sans food, the medium viscosity mouthfeel leads simultaneously with a very strong tannin presence and a blossoming burst of sweet, concentrated cherry, strawberry, and black fruit flavors, supported by an integrated acidity.
    This Dolcetto is more aggressive than the docile wines of this varietal I remember from my distant tastings. I can recall Barolos that displayed this wine’s complex structure.
    I look forward to having this wine tonight with grilled burgers and long sautéed mushrooms and onions. I predict the tannins will help to convey the lengthy palate lingering, well extracted fruit with most any savory cuisine, regardless of respective additive sauce or herb/spice profile.
    The label professes no use of “herbicides or chemical treatments.” I find this inclusively enjoyable, especially given the price point.
    The winery’s website lists 14 different offerings including a sparkler. You should visit the site, pecchenino.com.
    I am looking forward to reading more impressions of this wine from members.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 256 Tasting Notes

Message Board Post Public Message

  • MicklethePickle says:

    2/23/2023 8:42:00 PM - Okay, now I need to join this conversation, after seeing that Josch48 cited my review of the 2020 Cosme CdR so nicely, and then seeing a mention of the '92 Grange in RK's 11/1/22 message to J48. Was it indeed the '92, J48? I have that wine as it is my son's birth year, and there really wasn't a ton of great wine produced anywhere in the world that year. I'm glad my daughter was born in '89.

  • Rote Kappelle says:

    11/1/2022 3:43:00 PM - Thanks for your generous comment. I wish I was a writer. Hope you enjoyed your bottle of 1990 Poyferre. I have a '96 Grange that I will be opening in the next 12 months and when I do I will raise a glass in your honour. I am guessing that the vintage you missed out on in 1996 would have been the 1992. A good vintage, but I think 1990 and 1991 probably would be better still.

×
×