Two Buck Chuck comparison tasting (San Francisco): Darker color than the 2005 and 2012, but still quite pale; nose is completely gone; palate shows significant oxidation, some very faint residual red fruit, not much else. Too old.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Very strong fruity aroma as soon as the cork left the bottle. Left to breathe for a bit, it tasted of raspberry, cherry, oak and saw dust. Never expect much from Chuck, but after nearly 10 years forgotten in the wine rack, this wasn't a disappointment.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
1/2/2014 - aagrawal wrote: 70 Points
Two Buck Chuck comparison tasting (San Francisco): Darker color than the 2005 and 2012, but still quite pale; nose is completely gone; palate shows significant oxidation, some very faint residual red fruit, not much else. Too old.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
9/28/2010 - nvexplorer wrote: 70 Points
Barely good enough to cook with. Could not drink it all.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/20/2010 - linkinfinity wrote: 79 Points
Very strong fruity aroma as soon as the cork left the bottle. Left to breathe for a bit, it tasted of raspberry, cherry, oak and saw dust. Never expect much from Chuck, but after nearly 10 years forgotten in the wine rack, this wasn't a disappointment.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/22/2009 - msmallsr wrote:
Tasted fine, somewhat light for a cab. Weak finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/23/2009 - SipsnTips wrote: 90 Points
The fruit is showing fantastic. mellow tanins and showing great. Most likly at it's peek now.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment