Red, slight amount of sediment but unsurprising for a wine of this vintage. Not at all harsh, slipped down quite well among a group of folks. Nothing special in and of itself (certainly not compared to the 1990 Leoville Barton) but a competent, mature Bordeaux. The magnum acts as an excellent door stop.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
7/1/2012 - Cellarhead wrote: 86 Points
No tech notes taken. Unknown provenance. A decent bottle, but showing signs of wear and tear.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/2/2011 - bottlestopper wrote: 88 Points
still good. Decanted for two hours plus before consuming.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/2/2010 - cgmead wrote: 88 Points
Red, slight amount of sediment but unsurprising for a wine of this vintage. Not at all harsh, slipped down quite well among a group of folks. Nothing special in and of itself (certainly not compared to the 1990 Leoville Barton) but a competent, mature Bordeaux. The magnum acts as an excellent door stop.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/29/2009 - Lilja wrote: flawed
Bordeaux: Medoc & Haut-Medoc (Göteborg): Tyvärr korkskadad, doftar av jordig mögel och i munnen är det bara skarpa syror kvar. synd!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/23/2008 - Hub wrote:
excellent
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment