Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(5)

  1. greg@newsomehh.com

    greg@newsomehh.co…

    665 Tasting Notes

  2. tcarter

    tcarter

    2,959 Tasting Notes

  3. WineBurrowingWombat

    WineBurrowingWomb…

    1,175 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (10) Avg Score: 98.4 points

  • 2016 Napa Cults Blind - and a few Champs and such for fun: Black earth, soil, black cherry, blackberry, and a slight vanillin chocolate note, this was the most succulent and deep wine in the lineup. It shows cascading opulence without being overdone. The depth of flavor is striking, as is the distribution of weight across the palate. Rich without being heavy. This was the most ready of all the wines in the group. To no surprise, this was also the sexiest and even a bit chauvinistic when compared to its competition. If you were to consider opening any of these wines in the near future, the M7 would be the best and most party-ready to impress your wine friends in search of a little hedonistic debauchery. Fret not though, this is not in that “too much of a good thing” category. Precision and acidity live here too. A top performance this go-around.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • This was a 2016 vintage blind of: Abreu Thorevilos, Colgin IX, MacDonald, Scarecrow, Bond St. Eden, Eisele, Futo Oakville, Colgin Tychson and Vice Versa M7. Each wine had a decant of approximately five hours before the first sip, except for MacDonald, which had around three, and the Futo, which I believe was PnP. There were nine tasters, including CSIMM1161, wine proprietors and a prominent winemaker.

    I’d really love to post notes on all these wines, but unfortunately time is scarce, and I don’t think I would be able to get to it anytime soon. I am sure CSIMM will post a ton on each, so that should fill the gap. Instead, I am going to give the broad strokes here.

    The first thing to note is all these wines could have used more air, especially the MacDonald. We shorted it in the tasting, and I think there was an impact on how it showed. The other thing that could have impacted how the wines showed is bottle shock. Most of these bottles were packed onto an airplane a couple days prior. While I didn’t note any overtly off bottles, there is no doubt it could have played a role.

    I know a lot of folks that hate blinds. It can really test your palate, and crowing a winner means the other great bottles must “lose”. If you haven’t done it before, it can also wear you down and things can blend, so it does take a methodology and consistency to do it well. That said, all these wines were spectacular.

    While we didn’t have the group rank order them all, we did ask for a top 3. The consensus was 1. Magnificent 7 2. Futo and 3. Scarecrow. There were certainly others than received votes in the top 3, but overall, it was uniform across the group. Those top three were easily 99-100 pt wines, and the others were not far behind. A few comments on each (in no particular order outside the top 3):

    1. Magnificent 7: almost universally the #1 wine in the tasting, this had all the elements of perfection. Suave and powerful, with super refined tannins, excellent purity, unreal depth, and a finish for days. Nothing harsh and pure class without any element out of balance.

    2. Futo: super focused wine with precision, this wrapped power and grace into a regal package. Showed dark chocolate and powerful fruit intensity backed up by impressive levels of freshness and acidity. Simply outstanding.

    3. Scarecrow: the most opulent, plush, and sexy wine of the bunch. While some of the other wines were trying to get all the pieces to fit together, this one was complete on every level. Beautifully integrated with supple tannins and wonderful energy and balance.

    4. Colgin IX: the only mountain/hillside wine of the bunch. This wine really progressed over the course of the tasting to the point where it was gaining on the leaders. Lovely red soil profile with deep mineral driven flavors, the mid palate began expanding over time and produced a complex, powerful yet refined wine with fantastic length.

    5. MacDonald: this was one of the wines that was a bit discombobulated, and I attribute that mostly to lack of decant time. It showed more spice and woodsy character than usual and was a little rough around the edges despite clearly having the class, pedigree, and overall intensity to be amongst the best wines in Napa.

    6. Colgin Tychson: this had a soft, supple entry with opulent fruit and gorgeous floral notes. The mid palate stayed tight throughout, and it never really blossomed into what I am sure will be an epic wine. I love this bottling, and this is going to be spectacular with a bit more time.

    7. Eisele: another wine here that needed more time to unfurl. This showed possibly the best complexity of the bunch, both on the nose and in the glass. It had all the hallmark savory character, but the fruit was wound up tight and there was a bit of oak obscuring things. I’ve had this when its blown my mind, just needs more air or more time.

    8. Abreu Thorevilos: the most disappointing wine for me in this tasting. I was expecting it to vie for top honors and it couldn’t get out of its own way. It was super unresolved and reductive, with oak and tannin obscuring most everything. This is a fabulous vineyard and winemaker, so I am sure it will come around, and part of me wants to attribute this showing to bottle shock.

    9. Bond St Eden: another wine that was within striking distance of the leaders. Rich, textured, beautiful and still grippy, it showed a ton of class with hallmark red earth notes and killer concentration and length.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • AEN Wedding, enjoyed with AN Sam, JN spectacular

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Marc's Bday @ Totoraku (Totoraku): Hadn’t had this wine before but it was pretty epic. Shows off the strong vintage nicely. Very strong example of Cali Cult Cab style of winemaking. Excellent.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Possibly didn’t let this air long enough 3-4 hours but while I loved the concept of the 3 vineyards blended together the product isn’t there for me at the moment. Good and got better with air but am going to let my next bottle rest for a while.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 10 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

JebDunnuck.com

NOTE: Some content is property of JebDunnuck.com.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×