Flavors are very hidden...not as good as the first time I had it when it was not decanted. Not bad for the price though, bluebery, cassis with some spice on the finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Glasgow Offline (Chardon d'Or): A youthful appearance and a deep cassis nose. Sweet, ripe fruit on the attack. Deepish extraction and quite concentrated. Soft and fruity, and very smooth, with an interesting tobacco-bitterness on the finish. Concentrated stuff. Really very nice. Very Good Indeed+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
8/29/2007 - HTSwindell wrote: 86 Points
Flavors are very hidden...not as good as the first time I had it when it was not decanted. Not bad for the price though, bluebery, cassis with some spice on the finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/12/2005 - andrewstevenson.com wrote: 93 Points
Glasgow Offline (Chardon d'Or): A youthful appearance and a deep cassis nose. Sweet, ripe fruit on the attack. Deepish extraction and quite concentrated. Soft and fruity, and very smooth, with an interesting tobacco-bitterness on the finish. Concentrated stuff. Really very nice. Very Good Indeed+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/2/2005 - NobleRot wrote: 87 Points
Decent.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/27/2005 - NobleRot wrote: 87 Points
The 2001 was clearly better than the 2002, but decent wine nonetheless.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/24/2004 - jarvisdrinker wrote: 85 Points
The 2001 is much better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment