Tight and tannic, surprising for the 2002 vintage. I've been letting it sit so I'm guessing this is not something that will fix itself. Worth drinking but not as much fun as the 2003.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
5/22/2011 - NordicJim wrote: 84 Points
The tannins are hanging in there. Am going to give it a year or more at least. Nine years would seem to be long enough.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/2/2006 - jctaylor wrote: 86 Points
Tight and tannic, surprising for the 2002 vintage. I've been letting it sit so I'm guessing this is not something that will fix itself. Worth drinking but not as much fun as the 2003.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/17/2006 - carlwhat wrote: 84 Points
lean and herbal... avoid....
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/3/2006 - ken wrote: 87 Points
Moderate nose dominated by cherries with some spice notes. Simple on the palate with rather light notes of sour cherry and red fruit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/5/2005 - mraabpfg wrote: 84 Points
Okay wine wasnt anything about it that made it special, I wish I had more detail to share but maybe thats why I only rated it 84
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment