Piedmont night: I knew the identity of this wine but would have thought modern if blinded because of the savoury, tarry notes. Decadent wine with rich, creamy dark fruit; usually not my preferred style but wasn't offended by this.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Drank in restaurant, pre opened and decanted a couple of hours ahead. Lively nose of red cherry, rose and new leather. On the palate cherry, red currant, autumn leaves, fresh herbs, anise, licorice, leather and earth. Surprisingly young, lingering tannins yet to be integrated. Great balance, delicious, but would rather wait a few more years
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Light ruby color. Nose let’s out tons of cherries and roses/flowers. A lot of secondary notes - tar, wet leaves… great balance with fantastic acidity and chalky tannins. Tons of fruits - cherries, black currants - then pour pourri, tarry notes, tobacco leaves… the ending has nice oaky notes and it goes on and on for ages. A great Barolo - with further aging potential indeed!
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
I prepped by pulling out fresh crackers and Sartori black pepper world champion Wisconsin cheese. I'm betting this is going to need food. A little lightening of the wine color at the disc. Picking up light rose water aromas. Classic road tar flavor. Grip and tear after. Mouth feel of grit, raspy tannins and uber drying finish. My bottle tag note says Wine Spectator 97. Sweet sixteen and not ready. Typical. Hold. Time for cheese. I'll score the next. - I've written over a thousand notes and I was just reviewing the scale description below. I can't recall how many descriptions which sound like average or worse and get a 90 when it sounds like it ought to be in the upper 70s. Or lower... My two cents.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
4/5/2024 - melvinyeowq wrote: 93 Points
Piedmont night: I knew the identity of this wine but would have thought modern if blinded because of the savoury, tarry notes. Decadent wine with rich, creamy dark fruit; usually not my preferred style but wasn't offended by this.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/12/2024 - cvst Likes this wine: 93 Points
Drank in restaurant, pre opened and decanted a couple of hours ahead. Lively nose of red cherry, rose and new leather. On the palate cherry, red currant, autumn leaves, fresh herbs, anise, licorice, leather and earth. Surprisingly young, lingering tannins yet to be integrated. Great balance, delicious, but would rather wait a few more years
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/25/2023 - Wineallover Likes this wine: 94 Points
Really hitting the sweet spot and has time to evolve. No sharp edges, velvety, simply delicious!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/21/2022 - Condrieu82 Likes this wine: 95 Points
Light ruby color. Nose let’s out tons of cherries and roses/flowers. A lot of secondary notes - tar, wet leaves… great balance with fantastic acidity and chalky tannins. Tons of fruits - cherries, black currants - then pour pourri, tarry notes, tobacco leaves… the ending has nice oaky notes and it goes on and on for ages. A great Barolo - with further aging potential indeed!
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
10/13/2022 - swade wrote:
I prepped by pulling out fresh crackers and Sartori black pepper world champion Wisconsin cheese. I'm betting this is going to need food. A little lightening of the wine color at the disc. Picking up light rose water aromas. Classic road tar flavor. Grip and tear after. Mouth feel of grit, raspy tannins and uber drying finish. My bottle tag note says Wine Spectator 97. Sweet sixteen and not ready. Typical. Hold. Time for cheese. I'll score the next. - I've written over a thousand notes and I was just reviewing the scale description below. I can't recall how many descriptions which sound like average or worse and get a 90 when it sounds like it ought to be in the upper 70s. Or lower... My two cents.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment