More of this bottle was drunk without food than the prior 2 I've had, and I noticed more phenolic structure accordingly, still, maybe a couple years from reaching its peak.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
After loving a 2017 version of this I went looking and bought 2 bottles of the 2014. Before delivery I read two TNs from people whose palates I respect who didn't like it.
Concerned, I decided it was best to open the first bottle by myself.
Soft and delicate mousse, intriguing nose. Mix of soft and sharp strawberry on the palate. Beautiful complexity. A slight harshness on the finish fades with air and eventually turns to granite. I found it mesmerizing, a bit like a beautiful modern kinetic sculpture.
So I put the other notes down to difference in Champagne palates.
On Day 2 it had died, turning into a sour and flavorless wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
-- popped and poured -- -- tasted non-blind over a couple hours -- -- 81% Chardonnay, 19% Pinot Noir -- -- Dosage: none -- -- bottled: July 20, 2015; disgorged: September 2019 --
NOSE: ripe red apple; chai (oak); fairly expressive.
BODY: dark salmon color; medium-light bodied.
TASTE: quite flavorful --- Sweet Tarts finish, or cherry Spree; bitter florals; bone dry, but not austere; it seems to be open and giving. It's good, but neither I or Ash is anywhere close to being compelled to re-buy at $80.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Very good and complex champagne, this was a mélange of strawberry, granite and some dried nuts, not your typical fruity rose. It was on the fuller side but the acidity and minerality kept it very balanced and delicious.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
1/3/2024 - silton Likes this wine: 93 Points
More of this bottle was drunk without food than the prior 2 I've had, and I noticed more phenolic structure accordingly, still, maybe a couple years from reaching its peak.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/10/2023 - 5laton wrote:
Enjoyable bottle, but it still needs additional cellar time for my preferences. Hold.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/15/2023 - millej Likes this wine:
After loving a 2017 version of this I went looking and bought 2 bottles of the 2014. Before delivery I read two TNs from people whose palates I respect who didn't like it.
Concerned, I decided it was best to open the first bottle by myself.
Soft and delicate mousse, intriguing nose. Mix of soft and sharp strawberry on the palate. Beautiful complexity. A slight harshness on the finish fades with air and eventually turns to granite. I found it mesmerizing, a bit like a beautiful modern kinetic sculpture.
So I put the other notes down to difference in Champagne palates.
On Day 2 it had died, turning into a sour and flavorless wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/18/2023 - grafstrb wrote:
-- popped and poured --
-- tasted non-blind over a couple hours --
-- 81% Chardonnay, 19% Pinot Noir --
-- Dosage: none --
-- bottled: July 20, 2015; disgorged: September 2019 --
NOSE: ripe red apple; chai (oak); fairly expressive.
BODY: dark salmon color; medium-light bodied.
TASTE: quite flavorful --- Sweet Tarts finish, or cherry Spree; bitter florals; bone dry, but not austere; it seems to be open and giving. It's good, but neither I or Ash is anywhere close to being compelled to re-buy at $80.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/15/2022 - angryphoton Likes this wine: 92 Points
Very good and complex champagne, this was a mélange of strawberry, granite and some dried nuts, not your typical fruity rose. It was on the fuller side but the acidity and minerality kept it very balanced and delicious.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment